Passage Two Questions 51 to 55 are based on the following passage. Phonics, which involves sounding out words syllable(音节) by syllable, is the best way to teach children to read. But in many classrooms, this can be a dirty word. So much so that some teachers have had to sneak phonics teaching materials into the classroom. Most American children are taught to read in a way that study after study has found to be wrong. The consequences of this are striking. Less than half of all American adults were proficient readers in 2017. American fourth graders rank 15th on the Progress in International Literacy Study, an international exam. America is stuck in a debate about teaching children to read that has been going on for decades. Some advocate teaching symbol-sound relationships (the sound k can be spelled as c, k, ck, or ch), known as phonics. Others support an immersive approach (using pictures of a cat to learn the word cat), known as “whole language”. Most teachers today, almost three out of four according to a survey by the EdWeek Research Centre in 2019, use a mix called “balanced literacy”. This combination of methods is ineffective. “You can't sprinkle in a little phonics,” says Tenette Smith, executive director of elementary education and reading at Mississippi's education department. “It has to be systematic and explicitly taught.” Mississippi, often behind in social policy, has set an example here. In a state once notorious for its low reading scores, the Mississippi state legislature passed new literacy standards in 2013. Since then Mississippi has seen remarkable gains. Its fourth graders have moved from 49th (out of 50 states) to 29th on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a nationwide exam. In 2019 it was the only state to improve its scores. For the first time since measurement began, Mississippi's pupils are now average readers, a remarkable achievement in such a poor state. Mississippi's success is attributed to implementing reading methods supported by a body of research known as the science of reading. In 1997 Congress requested the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Department of Education to convene a National Reading Panel to end the “reading wars” and synthesize the evidence. The panel found that phonics, along with explicit instruction in phonemic (音位的) awareness, fluency and comprehension, worked best. Yet over two decades on, “balanced literacy” is still being taught in classrooms. But advances in statistics and brain imaging have disproved the whole-language method. To the teacher who is a proficient reader, literacy seems like a natural process that requires educated guessing, rather than the deliberate process emphasized by phonics. Teachers can imagine that they learned to read through osmosis (潜移默化) when they were children. Without proper training, they bring this to classrooms. 51. What do we learn about phonics in many American classrooms?A) It is ill reputed.B) It is mostly misapplied.C) It is arbitrarily excluded.D) It is misrepresented. 52. What has America been witnessing for decades?A) An obsession with innovating teaching methodologies of reading.B) An enduring debate over the approach to teaching children to read.C) An increasing concern with many children's inadequacy in literacy.D) An ever-forceful advocacy of a combined method for teaching reading. 53. Why does Tenette Smith think a combination of teaching methods is ineffective?A) Elementary school children will be frustrated when taught with several methods combined.B) Phonics has to be systematically applied and clearly taught to achieve the desired effect.C) Sprinkling in a little phonics deters the progress of even adequately motivated children.D) Balanced literacy fails to sustain children's interest in developing a good reading habit. 54. What does the author say Mississippi's success is attributed to?A) Convening a National Reading Panel to synthesize research evidence.B) Placing sufficient emphasis upon both fluency and comprehension.C) Adopting scientifically grounded approaches to teaching reading.D) Obtaining support from Congress to upgrade teaching methods. 55. What have advances in statistics and brain imaging proved ineffective?A) The teaching of symbol-sound relationships.C) Efforts to end the reading wars.B) Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness.D) The immersive approach.
Passage Two
Questions 51 to 55 are based on the following passage.
Phonics, which involves sounding out words syllable(音节) by syllable, is the best way to teach children to read. But in many classrooms, this can be a dirty word. So much so that some teachers have had to sneak phonics teaching materials into the classroom. Most American children are taught to read in a way that study after study has found to be wrong.
The consequences of this are striking. Less than half of all American adults were proficient readers in 2017. American fourth graders rank 15th on the Progress in International Literacy Study, an international exam.
America is stuck in a debate about teaching children to read that has been going on for decades. Some advocate teaching symbol-sound relationships (the sound k can be spelled as c, k, ck, or ch), known as phonics. Others support an immersive approach (using pictures of a cat to learn the word cat), known as “whole language”. Most teachers today, almost three out of four according to a survey by the EdWeek Research Centre in 2019, use a mix called “balanced literacy”. This combination of methods is ineffective. “You can't sprinkle in a little phonics,” says Tenette Smith, executive director of elementary education and reading at Mississippi's education department. “It has to be systematic and explicitly taught.”
Mississippi, often behind in social policy, has set an example here. In a state once notorious for its low reading scores, the Mississippi state legislature passed new literacy standards in 2013. Since then Mississippi has seen remarkable gains. Its fourth graders have moved from 49th (out of 50 states) to 29th on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a nationwide exam. In 2019 it was the only state to improve its scores. For the first time since measurement began, Mississippi's pupils are now average readers, a remarkable achievement in such a poor state.
Mississippi's success is attributed to implementing reading methods supported by a body of research known as the science of reading. In 1997 Congress requested the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Department of Education to convene a National Reading Panel to end the “reading wars” and synthesize the evidence. The panel found that phonics, along with explicit instruction in phonemic (音位的) awareness, fluency and comprehension, worked best.
Yet over two decades on, “balanced literacy” is still being taught in classrooms. But advances in statistics and brain imaging have disproved the whole-language method. To the teacher who is a proficient reader, literacy seems like a natural process that requires educated guessing, rather than the deliberate process emphasized by phonics. Teachers can imagine that they learned to read through osmosis (潜移默化) when they were children. Without proper training, they bring this to classrooms.
51. What do we learn about phonics in many American classrooms?
A) It is ill reputed.
B) It is mostly misapplied.
C) It is arbitrarily excluded.
D) It is misrepresented.
52. What has America been witnessing for decades?
A) An obsession with innovating teaching methodologies of reading.
B) An enduring debate over the approach to teaching children to read.
C) An increasing concern with many children's inadequacy in literacy.
D) An ever-forceful advocacy of a combined method for teaching reading.
53. Why does Tenette Smith think a combination of teaching methods is ineffective?
A) Elementary school children will be frustrated when taught with several methods combined.
B) Phonics has to be systematically applied and clearly taught to achieve the desired effect.
C) Sprinkling in a little phonics deters the progress of even adequately motivated children.
D) Balanced literacy fails to sustain children's interest in developing a good reading habit.
54. What does the author say Mississippi's success is attributed to?
A) Convening a National Reading Panel to synthesize research evidence.
B) Placing sufficient emphasis upon both fluency and comprehension.
C) Adopting scientifically grounded approaches to teaching reading.
D) Obtaining support from Congress to upgrade teaching methods.
55. What have advances in statistics and brain imaging proved ineffective?
A) The teaching of symbol-sound relationships.
C) Efforts to end the reading wars.
B) Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness.
D) The immersive approach.
题目解答
答案
51. A) 52. B) 53. B) 54. C) 55. D)
解析
文章讨论了美国在教授儿童阅读方法上的争议,特别是关于phonics(音素教学法)和whole language(全语言教学法)的争论。文章指出,尽管phonics被证明是最有效的教学方法,但在许多美国教室中,它却受到排斥。
步骤 2:分析问题
问题51询问在许多美国教室中,关于phonics的状况。根据文章,phonics在许多教室中被视为“脏话”,甚至有些老师不得不偷偷地将phonics教学材料带入教室。这表明phonics在这些教室中受到排斥。
步骤 3:分析问题
问题52询问美国几十年来一直在见证什么。文章指出,美国一直在进行关于如何教授儿童阅读方法的争论,这已经持续了几十年。
步骤 4:分析问题
问题53询问Tenette Smith为什么认为教学方法的组合是无效的。根据文章,Tenette Smith认为phonics必须系统地和明确地教授,而不能只是“撒一点”。
步骤 5:分析问题
问题54询问作者认为密西西比州的成功归因于什么。文章指出,密西西比州的成功归因于实施了由阅读科学支持的阅读方法。
步骤 6:分析问题
问题55询问统计学和脑成像的进步证明了什么方法无效。文章指出,统计学和脑成像的进步已经证明了全语言方法是无效的。