Does heavy use of cell phones pose a risk of cancer? This question has provoked controversy for many years. A new study in rats now adds to those concerns. Its data linked long-term, intense exposure to radiation from cell phones with an increased risk of cancer in the heart or brain. The results have yet to be confirmed, the authors note. Moreover, they add, it’s not yet clear what the findings may mean in terms of human health. Indeed, although the rat study found a link between cell-phone radiation and cancer, it offers no clues to why such a link might exist, notes Jonathan Samet. He teaches preventative medicine and directs the Institute for Global Health at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. Still, he calls the new study’s findings “significant.” They could lead to studies probing how cell-phone radiation might cause cancer, he says. Phone signals are relayed between cell towers and cell phones via radio waves. This radiofrequency — or RF — radiation is a type known as non-ionizing. Unlike X-rays and alpha particles, non-ionizing radiation does not deposit enough energy into cells to release electrons from atoms or molecules, producing ions. So it tends to be far less harmful than ionizing radiation, such as X-rays. But that does not mean radio waves might not cause harm. In very large doses this radiation will heat the body and cause tissue damage. But it’s not yet known what much lower RF levels might do, such as those from cell-phone use. Five years ago, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC, concluded that cell-phone use “is possibly carcinogenic.” That means it might cause cancer. Its conclusion was based on what little research data were available at that time. But notice that IARC was not certain. It said only that phone use might “possibly” cause cancer. So scientists at the National Toxicology Program, or NTP, investigated further. The scientists exposed rats to the same types of radiation emitted by U.S. cell phones. The cancers in these rats resembled those seen in some human studies that had probed harm from cell phone use. For this reason, NTP says its findings appear to support IARC’s conclusion that heavy cell-phone use might be harmful.【小题】(1) In Jonathan Samet’s view, the new study in rats is very valuable because _________.A.it links cell phone radiation with an increased risk of cancer in the heart or brainB.it confirms the association between frequent use of cell phones and a risk of cancerC.it has found why heavy use of cell phones leads to an increase of risk of cancerD.it can push researchers to explore how radiation from cell phones leads to cancer 【小题】(2) Radiation from cell phones is comparatively safe in that __________.A.in fact it comes from X-raysB.it has nothing to do with ionizingC.it releases much electronsD.it doesn’t produce alpha particles 【小题】(3) According to IARC’s conclusion we may learn that __________.A.it’s very reasonable to use cell phonesB.people should avoid using cell phonesC.it deserves our caution to use cell phonesD.we can use cell phones ignoring their harm
Does heavy use of cell phones pose a risk of cancer? This question has provoked controversy for many years. A new study in rats now adds to those concerns. Its data linked long-term, intense exposure to radiation from cell phones with an increased risk of cancer in the heart or brain. The results have yet to be confirmed, the authors note. Moreover, they add, it’s not yet clear what the findings may mean in terms of human health. Indeed, although the rat study found a link between cell-phone radiation and cancer, it offers no clues to why such a link might exist, notes Jonathan Samet. He teaches preventative medicine and directs the Institute for Global Health at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. Still, he calls the new study’s findings “significant.” They could lead to studies probing how cell-phone radiation might cause cancer, he says. Phone signals are relayed between cell towers and cell phones via radio waves. This radiofrequency — or RF — radiation is a type known as non-ionizing. Unlike X-rays and alpha particles, non-ionizing radiation does not deposit enough energy into cells to release electrons from atoms or molecules, producing ions. So it tends to be far less harmful than ionizing radiation, such as X-rays. But that does not mean radio waves might not cause harm. In very large doses this radiation will heat the body and cause tissue damage. But it’s not yet known what much lower RF levels might do, such as those from cell-phone use. Five years ago, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC, concluded that cell-phone use “is possibly carcinogenic.” That means it might cause cancer. Its conclusion was based on what little research data were available at that time. But notice that IARC was not certain. It said only that phone use might “possibly” cause cancer. So scientists at the National Toxicology Program, or NTP, investigated further. The scientists exposed rats to the same types of radiation emitted by U.S. cell phones. The cancers in these rats resembled those seen in some human studies that had probed harm from cell phone use. For this reason, NTP says its findings appear to support IARC’s conclusion that heavy cell-phone use might be harmful.【小题】(1) In Jonathan Samet’s view, the new study in rats is very valuable because _________.A.it links cell phone radiation with an increased risk of cancer in the heart or brainB.it confirms the association between frequent use of cell phones and a risk of cancerC.it has found why heavy use of cell phones leads to an increase of risk of cancerD.it can push researchers to explore how radiation from cell phones leads to cancer 【小题】(2) Radiation from cell phones is comparatively safe in that __________.A.in fact it comes from X-raysB.it has nothing to do with ionizingC.it releases much electronsD.it doesn’t produce alpha particles 【小题】(3) According to IARC’s conclusion we may learn that __________.A.it’s very reasonable to use cell phonesB.people should avoid using cell phonesC.it deserves our caution to use cell phonesD.we can use cell phones ignoring their harm
题目解答
答案
【答案】
| 【小题1】D | 【小题2】B | 【小题3】C |
解析
Jonathan Samet 认为新研究的价值在于它可能推动研究人员探索手机辐射如何导致癌症。他指出,虽然新研究发现了手机辐射与癌症之间的联系,但没有提供为什么存在这种联系的线索。因此,他认为新研究的发现是“重要的”,因为它们可能引导进一步的研究来探究手机辐射如何导致癌症。
步骤 2:理解手机辐射的安全性
手机辐射是通过无线电波传递的,这种辐射是非电离的,与X射线和阿尔法粒子不同,非电离辐射不会释放足够的能量来从原子或分子中释放电子,产生离子。因此,它通常比电离辐射(如X射线)危害小得多。但是,这并不意味着无线电波不会造成伤害。在非常大的剂量下,这种辐射会加热身体并造成组织损伤。然而,目前还不清楚较低的RF水平(如手机使用时的水平)会有什么影响。
步骤 3:理解 IARC 的结论
IARC 的结论是基于当时可用的少量研究数据得出的,他们认为手机使用“可能是致癌的”,这意味着它可能会导致癌症。但是,IARC 并不确定,他们只是说手机使用“可能”致癌。因此,根据 IARC 的结论,我们应该谨慎使用手机。