The rise of the Internet has been one of the most transformative developments in human history, comparable in impact to the invention of the printing press and the telegraph. Over two billion people worldwide now have access to vastly more information than ever before, and can communicate with each other instantly; often using Web-connected mobile devices they carry everywhere. But the Internet’s tremendous impact has only just begun. “Mass adoption of the Internet is driving one of the most exciting social, cultural, and political transformations in history, and unlike earlier periods of change, this time the effects are fully global,” Schmidt and Cohen write in their new book The New Digital Age. Perhaps the most profound changes will come when the five billion people worldwide who currently lack Internet access get online. The authors do an excellent job of examining the implications of the Internet revolution for individuals, governments, and institutions like the news media. But if the book has one major shortcoming, it’s that authors don’t spend enough time applying a critical eye to the role of Internet businesses in these sweeping changes. In their book, the authors provide the most authoritative volume to date that describes — and more importantly predicts — how the Internet will shape our lives in the coming decades. They paint a picture of a world in which individuals, companies, institutions, and governments must deal with two realities, one physical, and one virtual. At the core of the book is the idea that “technology is neutral, but people aren’t.” By using this concept as a starting point, the authors aim to move beyond the now familiar optimist vs. pessimist dichotomy (对立观点)that has characterized many recent debates about whether the rise of the Internet will ultimately be good or bad for society. In an interview with TIME earlier this week, Cohen said although he and his co-author are optimistic about many aspects of the Internet, they’re also realistic about the risks and dangers that lie ahead when the next five billion people come online, particularly with respect to personal privacy and state surveillance(监视). 1.In what way is the rise of the Internet similar to the invention of the printing press and the telegraph? A.It transforms human history. B.It makes daily communication easy. C.It is adopted by all human beings. D.It revolutionizes people's thinking. 2.In what respect is the book The New Digital Age considered inadequate? A.It fails to recognize the impact of the Internet technology. B.It fails to look into the social implications of the Internet. C.It lacks an objective evaluation of the role of Internet businesses. D.It does not address the technical aspects of Internet communication. 3.What will the future be like when everybody gets online? A.People will be living in two different realities. B.People will have equal access to information. C.People don’t have to travel to see the world. D.People don’t have to communicate face to face. 4.What does the passage say about the authors of The New Digital Age? A.They leave many questions unanswered concerning the Internet. B.They are optimistic about the future of the Internet revolution. C.They have explored the unknown territories of the virtual world. D.They don’t take sides in analyzing the effects of the Internet.
The rise of the Internet has been one of the most transformative developments in human history, comparable in impact to the invention of the printing press and the telegraph. Over two billion people worldwide now have access to vastly more information than ever before, and can communicate with each other instantly; often using Web-connected mobile devices they carry everywhere. But the Internet’s tremendous impact has only just begun.
“Mass adoption of the Internet is driving one of the most exciting social, cultural, and political transformations in history, and unlike earlier periods of change, this time the effects are fully global,” Schmidt and Cohen write in their new book The New Digital Age.
Perhaps the most profound changes will come when the five billion people worldwide who currently lack Internet access get online. The authors do an excellent job of examining the implications of the Internet revolution for individuals, governments, and institutions like the news media. But if the book has one major shortcoming, it’s that authors don’t spend enough time applying a critical eye to the role of Internet businesses in these sweeping changes.
In their book, the authors provide the most authoritative volume to date that describes — and more importantly predicts — how the Internet will shape our lives in the coming decades. They paint a picture of a world in which individuals, companies, institutions, and governments must deal with two realities, one physical, and one virtual.
At the core of the book is the idea that “technology is neutral, but people aren’t.” By using this concept as a starting point, the authors aim to move beyond the now familiar optimist vs. pessimist dichotomy (对立观点)that has characterized many recent debates about whether the rise of the Internet will ultimately be good or bad for society. In an interview with TIME earlier this week, Cohen said although he and his co-author are optimistic about many aspects of the Internet, they’re also realistic about the risks and dangers that lie ahead when the next five billion people come online, particularly with respect to personal privacy and state surveillance(监视).
1.In what way is the rise of the Internet similar to the invention of the printing press and the telegraph?
A.It transforms human history. |
B.It makes daily communication easy. |
C.It is adopted by all human beings. |
D.It revolutionizes people's thinking. |
2.In what respect is the book The New Digital Age considered inadequate?
A.It fails to recognize the impact of the Internet technology.
B.It fails to look into the social implications of the Internet.
C.It lacks an objective evaluation of the role of Internet businesses.
D.It does not address the technical aspects of Internet communication.
3.What will the future be like when everybody gets online?
A.People will be living in two different realities.
B.People will have equal access to information.
C.People don’t have to travel to see the world.
D.People don’t have to communicate face to face.
4.What does the passage say about the authors of The New Digital Age?
A.They leave many questions unanswered concerning the Internet.
B.They are optimistic about the future of the Internet revolution.
C.They have explored the unknown territories of the virtual world.
D.They don’t take sides in analyzing the effects of the Internet.
题目解答
答案
1.B
2.C
3.A
4.D
解析
- 考查要点:第一题要求理解文章中互联网与印刷术、电报的相似性,需抓住两者对人类沟通方式的革命性影响。
- 解题核心:第二题需明确文章对书籍不足的评价,关键点在于作者对互联网企业角色的批判性分析。
- 破题关键:第三题需结合文章对未来的预测,即物理与虚拟现实的并存。第四题需判断作者是否保持中立态度。
第1题
关键句:首段将互联网与印刷术、电报并列,强调其对人类历史的“transformative”影响。
- 选项B正确,因三者均极大改变了人类的日常沟通方式(如印刷术推动知识传播,电报实现即时通讯)。
- 选项A错误,因互联网本身是历史的产物,而非“改变历史”的主体。
第2题
关键句:文章指出“书籍不足之处在于未对互联网企业的角色进行批判性分析”。
- 选项C正确,因作者仅描述了互联网的影响,未深入探讨企业行为的利弊。
- 选项B错误,因书籍已分析互联网的社会影响(如个人隐私问题)。
第3题
关键句:书中描述未来“个体需应对物理与虚拟两个现实”。
- 选项A正确,直接对应文中“two realities, one physical, and one virtual”。
- 选项B/D错误,因文章未提及“信息平等”或“无需面对面交流”。
第4题
关键句:作者提出“技术是中性的,但人不是”,避免陷入“乐观 vs 悲观”对立。
- 选项D正确,因作者既肯定互联网潜力,又关注隐私风险,保持中立。
- 选项B错误,因作者并非完全乐观(如提到隐私威胁)。