题目
We talk continuously about how to make children more"resilient(有恢复力的)",but whatever were doing, it's not working. Rates of anxiety disorders and depression are rising rapidly among teenagers. What are we doing wrong? Nassim Taleb invented the word "antifragile" and used it to describe a small but very important class of systems that gain from shocks, challenges, and disorder. The immune system is one of them: it requires exposure to certain kinds of bacteria and potential allergens(过敏源)in childhood in order to develop to its full ability. Children's social and emotional abilities are as antifragile as their immune systems. If we overprotect kids and keep them "safe" from unpleasant social situations and negative emotions we deprive(剥夺)them of the challenges and opportunities for skill-building they need to grow strong. Such children are likely to suffer more when exposed later to other unpleasant but ordinary life events, such as teasing and social rejection. It's not the kids fault. In the UK, as in the US, parents became much more fearful in the 1980s and 1990s as cable TV and later the Internet exposed everyone, more and more, to those rare occurrences of crimes and accidents that now occur less and less, Outdoor play and independent mobility went down; screen time and adult-monitored activities went up. Yet free play in which kids work out their own rules of engagement, take small risks, and learn to master small dangers turns out to be vital for the development of adult social and even physical competence, Depriving them of free play prevents their social-emotional growth. Norwegian play researchers Ellen Sandseter and Leif Kennair warned: "We may observe an increased anxiety or mental disorders in society if children are forbidden from participating in age adequate risky play." They wrote those words in 2011. Over the following few years, their prediction came true. Kids born after 1994 are suffering from much higher rates of anxiety disorders and depression than the previous generation did. Besides, there is also a rise in the rate at which teenage girls are admitted to hospital for deliberately harming themselves. What can we do to change these trends? How can we raise kids strong enough to handle the ordinary and extraordinary challenges of life? We can't guarantee that giving primary school children more independence today will bring down the rate of teenage suicide tomorrow. The links between childhood overprotection and teenage mental illness are suggestive but not clear-cut. Yet there are good reasons to suspect that by depriving our naturally antifragile kids of the wide range of experiences they need to become strong, we are systematically preventing their growth. We should let go-and let them grow.(1)Why does the author mention the immune system in Paragraph 2? ____ A. To stress its importanceB. To analyze the cause of anxietyC. To question the latest discovery.D. To help understand a new word(2)Parents overprotect children because ____ .A. they want to keep children from being teasedB. they are concerned about their children's safetyC. parent-monitored activities are a mustD. children are not independent enough(3)According to the author, free play can ____ .A. develop children' s leadership skillsB. strengthen children' s friendshipC. reduce children's risky behaviorD. promote children's resilience(4)Which of the following does the author probably agree with? ____ A. Stop trying to perfect your childB. It takes great courage to raise childrenC. Prepare the child for the road, not the road for the child.D. While we try to teach our children all about life, our children teach us what life is all about.
We talk continuously about how to make children more"resilient(有恢复力的)",but whatever were doing, it's not working. Rates of anxiety disorders and depression are rising rapidly among teenagers. What are we doing wrong?
Nassim Taleb invented the word "antifragile" and used it to describe a small but very important class of systems that gain from shocks, challenges, and disorder. The immune system is one of them: it requires exposure to certain kinds of bacteria and potential allergens(过敏源)in childhood in order to develop to its full ability.
Children's social and emotional abilities are as antifragile as their immune systems. If we overprotect kids and keep them "safe" from unpleasant social situations and negative emotions we deprive(剥夺)them of the challenges and opportunities for skill-building they need to grow strong. Such children are likely to suffer more when exposed later to other unpleasant but ordinary life events, such as teasing and social rejection.
It's not the kids fault. In the UK, as in the US, parents became much more fearful in the 1980s and 1990s as cable TV and later the Internet exposed everyone, more and more, to those rare occurrences of crimes and accidents that now occur less and less, Outdoor play and independent mobility went down; screen time and adult-monitored activities went up.
Yet free play in which kids work out their own rules of engagement, take small risks, and learn to master small dangers turns out to be vital for the development of adult social and even physical competence, Depriving them of free play prevents their social-emotional growth. Norwegian play researchers Ellen Sandseter and Leif Kennair warned: "We may observe an increased anxiety or mental disorders in society if children are forbidden from participating in age adequate risky play."
They wrote those words in 2011. Over the following few years, their prediction came true. Kids born after 1994 are suffering from much higher rates of anxiety disorders and depression than the previous generation did. Besides, there is also a rise in the rate at which teenage girls are admitted to hospital for deliberately harming themselves.
What can we do to change these trends? How can we raise kids strong enough to handle the ordinary and extraordinary challenges of life? We can't guarantee that giving primary school children more independence today will bring down the rate of teenage suicide tomorrow. The links between childhood overprotection and teenage mental illness are suggestive but not clear-cut. Yet there are good reasons to suspect that by depriving our naturally antifragile kids of the wide range of experiences they need to become strong, we are systematically preventing their growth. We should let go-and let them grow.
(1)Why does the author mention the immune system in Paragraph 2? ____
A. To stress its importance
B. To analyze the cause of anxiety
C. To question the latest discovery.
D. To help understand a new word
(2)Parents overprotect children because ____ .
A. they want to keep children from being teased
B. they are concerned about their children's safety
C. parent-monitored activities are a must
D. children are not independent enough
(3)According to the author, free play can ____ .
A. develop children' s leadership skills
B. strengthen children' s friendship
C. reduce children's risky behavior
D. promote children's resilience
(4)Which of the following does the author probably agree with? ____
A. Stop trying to perfect your child
B. It takes great courage to raise children
C. Prepare the child for the road, not the road for the child.
D. While we try to teach our children all about life, our children teach us what life is all about.
Nassim Taleb invented the word "antifragile" and used it to describe a small but very important class of systems that gain from shocks, challenges, and disorder. The immune system is one of them: it requires exposure to certain kinds of bacteria and potential allergens(过敏源)in childhood in order to develop to its full ability.
Children's social and emotional abilities are as antifragile as their immune systems. If we overprotect kids and keep them "safe" from unpleasant social situations and negative emotions we deprive(剥夺)them of the challenges and opportunities for skill-building they need to grow strong. Such children are likely to suffer more when exposed later to other unpleasant but ordinary life events, such as teasing and social rejection.
It's not the kids fault. In the UK, as in the US, parents became much more fearful in the 1980s and 1990s as cable TV and later the Internet exposed everyone, more and more, to those rare occurrences of crimes and accidents that now occur less and less, Outdoor play and independent mobility went down; screen time and adult-monitored activities went up.
Yet free play in which kids work out their own rules of engagement, take small risks, and learn to master small dangers turns out to be vital for the development of adult social and even physical competence, Depriving them of free play prevents their social-emotional growth. Norwegian play researchers Ellen Sandseter and Leif Kennair warned: "We may observe an increased anxiety or mental disorders in society if children are forbidden from participating in age adequate risky play."
They wrote those words in 2011. Over the following few years, their prediction came true. Kids born after 1994 are suffering from much higher rates of anxiety disorders and depression than the previous generation did. Besides, there is also a rise in the rate at which teenage girls are admitted to hospital for deliberately harming themselves.
What can we do to change these trends? How can we raise kids strong enough to handle the ordinary and extraordinary challenges of life? We can't guarantee that giving primary school children more independence today will bring down the rate of teenage suicide tomorrow. The links between childhood overprotection and teenage mental illness are suggestive but not clear-cut. Yet there are good reasons to suspect that by depriving our naturally antifragile kids of the wide range of experiences they need to become strong, we are systematically preventing their growth. We should let go-and let them grow.
(1)Why does the author mention the immune system in Paragraph 2? ____
A. To stress its importance
B. To analyze the cause of anxiety
C. To question the latest discovery.
D. To help understand a new word
(2)Parents overprotect children because ____ .
A. they want to keep children from being teased
B. they are concerned about their children's safety
C. parent-monitored activities are a must
D. children are not independent enough
(3)According to the author, free play can ____ .
A. develop children' s leadership skills
B. strengthen children' s friendship
C. reduce children's risky behavior
D. promote children's resilience
(4)Which of the following does the author probably agree with? ____
A. Stop trying to perfect your child
B. It takes great courage to raise children
C. Prepare the child for the road, not the road for the child.
D. While we try to teach our children all about life, our children teach us what life is all about.
题目解答
答案
1. D. 细节理解题.根据第二段"Nassim Taleb invented the word "antifragile" and used it to describe a small but very important class of systems that gain from shocks, challenges, and disorder. The immune (免疫的) system is one of themNassim Taleb发明了"抗过敏"这个词,并用它来描述一种小而非常重要的系统,这种系统可以从电击、挑战和紊乱中获益.免疫系统就是其中之一".可知提到免疫系统是为了来理解"抗过敏"这个词.故选D.
2.B.细节理解题.根据第三段" If we overprotect kids and keep them "safe" from unpleasant social situations and negative emotions, we deprive (剥夺) them of the challenges and opportunities for skill-building they need to grow strong.果我们过度保护孩子,使他们"安全"免受不愉快的社交环境和负面情绪的伤害,我们就会剥夺(掠夺)他们成长为强大的技能培养所需的挑战和机会."可见父母过度保护还是为了他们的安全.故选B.
3. D.推理判断题.根据第五段"Yet free play in which kids work out their own rules of engagement, take small risks, and learn to master small dangers turns out to be vital for the development of adult social and even physical competence. Depriving them of free play prevents their social-emotional growth. Norwegian play researchers Ellen Sandseter and Leif Kennair warned: "We may observe an increased anxiety or mental disorders in society if children are forbidden from participating in age adequate risky play."然而,在自由游戏中,孩子们制定自己的游戏规则,承担小风险,学会掌握小危险,这对成人社会甚至身体能力的发展至关重要.剥夺他们的自由游戏会阻止他们的社会情感增长.挪威的游戏研究者Ellen Sandsetter和Leif Kennair警告说.艾德:"如果禁止儿童参加适当年龄的危险游戏,我们可能会观察到社会中焦虑或精神障碍的增加.""可知自由游戏,可以增加孩子的社会适应力.故选D.
4. C. 推理判断题.根据最后一段"Yet there are good reasons to suspect that by depriving our naturally antifragile kids of the wide range of experiences they need to become strong, we are systematically preventing their growth. We should let go-and let them grow.但有充分的理由怀疑,通过剥夺我们天生不灵活的孩子变强所需的广泛经验,我们有系统地阻止了他们的成长.我们应该放手让他们成长."可知选项C正确.故选C.
2.B.细节理解题.根据第三段" If we overprotect kids and keep them "safe" from unpleasant social situations and negative emotions, we deprive (剥夺) them of the challenges and opportunities for skill-building they need to grow strong.果我们过度保护孩子,使他们"安全"免受不愉快的社交环境和负面情绪的伤害,我们就会剥夺(掠夺)他们成长为强大的技能培养所需的挑战和机会."可见父母过度保护还是为了他们的安全.故选B.
3. D.推理判断题.根据第五段"Yet free play in which kids work out their own rules of engagement, take small risks, and learn to master small dangers turns out to be vital for the development of adult social and even physical competence. Depriving them of free play prevents their social-emotional growth. Norwegian play researchers Ellen Sandseter and Leif Kennair warned: "We may observe an increased anxiety or mental disorders in society if children are forbidden from participating in age adequate risky play."然而,在自由游戏中,孩子们制定自己的游戏规则,承担小风险,学会掌握小危险,这对成人社会甚至身体能力的发展至关重要.剥夺他们的自由游戏会阻止他们的社会情感增长.挪威的游戏研究者Ellen Sandsetter和Leif Kennair警告说.艾德:"如果禁止儿童参加适当年龄的危险游戏,我们可能会观察到社会中焦虑或精神障碍的增加.""可知自由游戏,可以增加孩子的社会适应力.故选D.
4. C. 推理判断题.根据最后一段"Yet there are good reasons to suspect that by depriving our naturally antifragile kids of the wide range of experiences they need to become strong, we are systematically preventing their growth. We should let go-and let them grow.但有充分的理由怀疑,通过剥夺我们天生不灵活的孩子变强所需的广泛经验,我们有系统地阻止了他们的成长.我们应该放手让他们成长."可知选项C正确.故选C.