What do we learn about new science Ph.D.s in the United States today?There was a time not long ago when new science Ph.D.s in the United States were expected to pursue a career path in academia (学术界).But today,most graduates end up working outside academia,not only in industry but also in careers such as science policy,communications,and patent law.根据材料回答问题A、They lack the skills and expertise needed for their jobs.B、They can choose from a wider range of well-paying jobs.C、They often have to seek jobs outside the academic circle.D、They are regarded as the nation’s driving force of change.
What do we learn about new science Ph.D.s in the United States today?
There was a time not long ago when new science Ph.D.s in the United States were expected to pursue a career path in academia (学术界).But today,most graduates end up working outside academia,not only in industry but also in careers such as science policy,communications,and patent law.
根据材料回答问题
- A、They lack the skills and expertise needed for their jobs.
- B、They can choose from a wider range of well-paying jobs.
- C、They often have to seek jobs outside the academic circle.
- D、They are regarded as the nation’s driving force of change.
题目解答
答案
解析
考查要点:本题考查学生对材料主旨的理解能力,需要结合上下文推断作者观点,并排除干扰选项。
解题核心:抓住材料中“过去与现在”的对比,明确新科学博士职业选择的变化趋势。
关键点:材料开篇指出过去新科学博士“预期在学术界发展”,但“今天大多数毕业生在学术界以外工作”,核心信息是职业选择范围扩大,尤其强调非学术领域。
选项分析:
-
选项A(They lack the skills and expertise needed for their jobs):
材料未提及新博士的技能或专业能力问题,反而隐含其适应性(如转向科学政策、通信等新领域),与材料内容无关。 -
选项B(They can choose from a wider range of well-paying jobs):
材料提到职业范围扩大(如工业、科学政策等),但“well-paying”(高薪)是主观推断,原文未明确说明薪资情况,属于过度解读。 -
选项C(They often have to seek jobs outside the academic circle):
直接对应材料中的“most graduates end up working outside academia”,明确指出学术界以外就业是主流趋势,为正确答案。 -
选项D(They are regarded as the nation’s driving force of change):
虽然材料最后一句提到“the nation’s driving force”,但该表述是描述科学领域整体影响,而非新博士的直接特征,与问题关联性较弱。