题目
I have known very few writers, but those I have known, and whom I respected, confess at once that they have little idea where they are going when they first set pen to paper. They have a character, perhaps two; they are in that condition of eager discomfort which passes for inspiration; all admit radical changes of destination once the journey has begun; one, to my certain knowledge, spent nine months on a novel about Kashmir, then reset the whole thing in the Scottish Highlands. I never heard of anyone making a "skeleton", as we were taught at school. In the breaking and remaking, in the timing, interweaving, beginning afresh, the writer comes to discern things in his material which were not consciously in his mind when he began. This organic process, often leading to moments of extraordinary self-discovery, is of an indescribable fascination. A blurred image appears, he adds a brushstroke and another, and it is gone; but something was there, and he will not rest till he has captured it. Sometimes the yeast within a writer outlives a book he has written. I have heard of writers who read nothing but their own books, like adolescents they stand before the mirror, and still cannot fathom the exact outline of the vision before them. For the same reason, writers talk interminably about their own books, winkling out hidden meanings, superimposing new ones, begging response from those around them. Of course a writer doing this is misunderstood: he might as well try to explain a crime or a love affair. He is also, incidentally, an nnforgivable bore. This temptation to cover the distance between himself and the reader, to study his image in the sight of those who do not know him, can be his undoing: he has begun to write to please. A young English writer made the pertinent observation a year or two back that the talent goes into the first draft, and the art into the drafts that follow. For this reason also the writer, like any other artist, has no resting place, no crowd or movement in which he may take comfort, no judgment from outside which can replace the judgment from within. A writer makes order out of the anarchy of his heart; he submits himself to a more ruthless discipline than any critic dreamed of, and when he flirts with fame, he is taking time off from living with himself, from the search for what his world contains at its inmost point.The writers that the author is familiar with confess that they would A. work out the ending of a novel in advance.B. follow the writing methods learned at school.C. remodel the main character in writing.D. make changes to the stories they first construct.
I have known very few writers, but those I have known, and whom I respected, confess at once that they have little idea where they are going when they first set pen to paper. They have a character, perhaps two; they are in that condition of eager discomfort which passes for inspiration; all admit radical changes of destination once the journey has begun; one, to my certain knowledge, spent nine months on a novel about Kashmir, then reset the whole thing in the Scottish Highlands. I never heard of anyone making a "skeleton", as we were taught at school. In the breaking and remaking, in the timing, interweaving, beginning afresh, the writer comes to discern things in his material which were not consciously in his mind when he began. This organic process, often leading to moments of extraordinary self-discovery, is of an indescribable fascination. A blurred image appears, he adds a brushstroke and another, and it is gone; but something was there, and he will not rest till he has captured it. Sometimes the yeast within a writer outlives a book he has written. I have heard of writers who read nothing but their own books, like adolescents they stand before the mirror, and still cannot fathom the exact outline of the vision before them. For the same reason, writers talk interminably about their own books, winkling out hidden meanings, superimposing new ones, begging response from those around them. Of course a writer doing this is misunderstood: he might as well try to explain a crime or a love affair. He is also, incidentally, an nnforgivable bore. This temptation to cover the distance between himself and the reader, to study his image in the sight of those who do not know him, can be his undoing: he has begun to write to please. A young English writer made the pertinent observation a year or two back that the talent goes into the first draft, and the art into the drafts that follow. For this reason also the writer, like any other artist, has no resting place, no crowd or movement in which he may take comfort, no judgment from outside which can replace the judgment from within. A writer makes order out of the anarchy of his heart; he submits himself to a more ruthless discipline than any critic dreamed of, and when he flirts with fame, he is taking time off from living with himself, from the search for what his world contains at its inmost point.The writers that the author is familiar with confess that they would
- A. work out the ending of a novel in advance.
- B. follow the writing methods learned at school.
- C. remodel the main character in writing.
- D. make changes to the stories they first construct.
题目解答
答案
D
解析
步骤 1:理解作者描述的写作过程
作者描述了他所认识的作家在写作时的创作过程,指出他们通常在开始写作时并没有明确的计划或目标,而是随着写作的进行不断调整和修改。
步骤 2:分析选项
A. 工作出小说的结局:这与作者描述的作家在写作时没有明确的计划或目标不符。
B. 遵循在学校学到的写作方法:作者提到从未听说过有人使用在学校学到的“骨架”方法。
C. 在写作中重塑主要角色:虽然作家在写作过程中可能会修改角色,但这不是作者主要强调的点。
D. 对他们最初构建的故事进行修改:这与作者描述的作家在写作过程中不断调整和修改故事内容相符。
步骤 3:选择正确答案
根据作者的描述,作家在写作过程中会不断调整和修改故事内容,因此正确答案是D。
作者描述了他所认识的作家在写作时的创作过程,指出他们通常在开始写作时并没有明确的计划或目标,而是随着写作的进行不断调整和修改。
步骤 2:分析选项
A. 工作出小说的结局:这与作者描述的作家在写作时没有明确的计划或目标不符。
B. 遵循在学校学到的写作方法:作者提到从未听说过有人使用在学校学到的“骨架”方法。
C. 在写作中重塑主要角色:虽然作家在写作过程中可能会修改角色,但这不是作者主要强调的点。
D. 对他们最初构建的故事进行修改:这与作者描述的作家在写作过程中不断调整和修改故事内容相符。
步骤 3:选择正确答案
根据作者的描述,作家在写作过程中会不断调整和修改故事内容,因此正确答案是D。