Visit any antiques stores and you'll encounter artifacts from the past: photographs, letters, a brochure detailing the Sinclair dinosaur exhibit from the 1964-1965 World's Fair, the ephemera of history. Yet these objects aren't truly ephemeral, because they're still here, decades, even centuries later. Why? Because they're tangible.Have you pondered the life cycle of intangible formats, digital information, given that those who produce these artifacts seldom make provision for their long-term preservation? For millennia, we've known what we've known due to artifacts that have survived, often despite their original creators' neglect. The thing itself is the medium that delivers the information. At the time of creation, no attempts were made at intentional preservation, yet analog materials have a chance of surviving and serving as the historical record that biographers, historians, and novelists rely on. Libraries and archives have traditionally shouldered the responsibility of organization, preservation, and access to information. Thus, librarians digitize the tangible so that researchers the world over can quickly search and access their holdings. The result is an embarrassment of historical riches, which brings its own needle-and-haystack problems.Librarians' selfless devotion can act against us when users point to universality of access by holding up a cellphone and saying, "it's all in here" as evidence that libraries are less vital for researchers today. Yet how was that universality of access made possible and, perhaps more importantly, how is it maintained? Who curates what is preserved? When it comes to born-digital information, the terrifying answer can be: if not librarians and archivists, then no one. Digital information requires a great deal more care than analog.Even when a digital object is preserved, it may only be the carrier that's saved, not the information itself. As technology advances and a format becomes obsolete, the object is useless. Have you ever stared helplessly at a ZIP disk, thinking: how do I get the files off this? Without constant migration of digital assets, a nightmare about the foreseeable future is what keeps historians up at night: a historical record that abruptly stops when digital assets replace analog.As a librarian whose day job revolves around special collections and digital assets, I share the night terrors of historians, and I'd be lying if I said a comprehensive preservation solution currently exists. Yet researchers can take some comfort in the fact that there are a multitude of librarians devoted to discovering, organizing, and preserving digital information for researchers current and future. Librarians are uniquely positioned to understand how end users seek and use information. Thus we play an integral role in identifying, preserving, and providing accessibility to digital artifacts so that, while future researchers may find the digital realm a challenging place to ply their trade, they won't find it an impossible one.1. The author mentions the artifacts from the past to ________.A) introduce the collection of antiquesB) contrast them with everyday itemsC) bring up the issue of preservationD) comment on their historical value2. Compared with digital objects, tangible artifacts ________.A) are less subject to their creators' neglectB) convey information in a more direct wayC) require more intentional preservationD) are less likely to suffer serious damage3. According to Paragraph 3, librarians' work may result in ________.A) oversupply of materialsB) undervaluation of librariesC) researchers' underperformanceD) users' overreliance on technology4. The "ZIP disk" is cited as an example to show ________.A) the hazard of retrieving files through unusual meansB) the infeasibility of constantly migrating digital assetsC) the possibility of losing information in obsolete formatsD) the inconvenience of storing information on analog devices5. Which of the following statements best summarizes the text?A) Hard work should be done to preserve artifacts.B) Contributions of librarians should be recognized.C) Accessing databases is essential to researchers.D) Keeping digital historical records is a challenge.
Visit any antiques stores and you'll encounter artifacts from the past: photographs, letters, a brochure detailing the Sinclair dinosaur exhibit from the 1964-1965 World's Fair, the ephemera of history. Yet these objects aren't truly ephemeral, because they're still here, decades, even centuries later. Why? Because they're tangible. Have you pondered the life cycle of intangible formats, digital information, given that those who produce these artifacts seldom make provision for their long-term preservation? For millennia, we've known what we've known due to artifacts that have survived, often despite their original creators' neglect. The thing itself is the medium that delivers the information. At the time of creation, no attempts were made at intentional preservation, yet analog materials have a chance of surviving and serving as the historical record that biographers, historians, and novelists rely on. Libraries and archives have traditionally shouldered the responsibility of organization, preservation, and access to information. Thus, librarians digitize the tangible so that researchers the world over can quickly search and access their holdings. The result is an embarrassment of historical riches, which brings its own needle-and-haystack problems. Librarians' selfless devotion can act against us when users point to universality of access by holding up a cellphone and saying, "it's all in here" as evidence that libraries are less vital for researchers today. Yet how was that universality of access made possible and, perhaps more importantly, how is it maintained? Who curates what is preserved? When it comes to born-digital information, the terrifying answer can be: if not librarians and archivists, then no one. Digital information requires a great deal more care than analog. Even when a digital object is preserved, it may only be the carrier that's saved, not the information itself. As technology advances and a format becomes obsolete, the object is useless. Have you ever stared helplessly at a ZIP disk, thinking: how do I get the files off this? Without constant migration of digital assets, a nightmare about the foreseeable future is what keeps historians up at night: a historical record that abruptly stops when digital assets replace analog. As a librarian whose day job revolves around special collections and digital assets, I share the night terrors of historians, and I'd be lying if I said a comprehensive preservation solution currently exists. Yet researchers can take some comfort in the fact that there are a multitude of librarians devoted to discovering, organizing, and preserving digital information for researchers current and future. Librarians are uniquely positioned to understand how end users seek and use information. Thus we play an integral role in identifying, preserving, and providing accessibility to digital artifacts so that, while future researchers may find the digital realm a challenging place to ply their trade, they won't find it an impossible one. 1. The author mentions the artifacts from the past to ________. A) introduce the collection of antiques B) contrast them with everyday items C) bring up the issue of preservation D) comment on their historical value 2. Compared with digital objects, tangible artifacts ________. A) are less subject to their creators' neglect B) convey information in a more direct way C) require more intentional preservation D) are less likely to suffer serious damage 3. According to Paragraph 3, librarians' work may result in ________. A) oversupply of materials B) undervaluation of libraries C) researchers' underperformance D) users' overreliance on technology 4. The "ZIP disk" is cited as an example to show ________. A) the hazard of retrieving files through unusual means B) the infeasibility of constantly migrating digital assets C) the possibility of losing information in obsolete formats D) the inconvenience of storing information on analog devices 5. Which of the following statements best summarizes the text? A) Hard work should be done to preserve artifacts. B) Contributions of librarians should be recognized. C) Accessing databases is essential to researchers. D) Keeping digital historical records is a challenge.
题目解答
答案
解析
本题主要考查对文章内容的理解、推理以及对作者意图的把握。解题时需要仔细分析每个段落的主旨,理解作者通过各种事例和论述想要表达的核心观点。
第1题
- 解题思路:文章开头提到过去的文物,如照片、信件等,指出它们虽然被称为“短暂的历史物品”,但因为是有形的所以能留存下来。接着作者话锋一转,提出关于无形的数字信息格式的生命周期以及长期保存问题。由此可见,作者提及过去的文物是为了引出数字信息保存这一话题。
- 解析:
- A选项“介绍古董收藏”,文章重点并非介绍古董收藏,而是围绕信息保存展开,所以A选项错误。
- B选项“将它们与日常物品对比”,文中未提及与日常物品的对比,B选项不符合文意。
- C选项“提出保存问题”,与我们分析的作者意图一致,C选项正确。
- D选项“评论它们的历史价值”,文章重点不是评论文物的历史价值,而是引出数字信息保存问题,D选项错误。
第2题
- 解题思路:文中提到“有形的物品本身就是传递信息的媒介”,而数字信息即使被保存,也可能只是保存了载体,当技术进步格式过时,信息就可能丢失。这说明有形文物在传递信息方面更直接。
- 解析:
- A选项“较少受到创作者的忽视”,文中提到“那些创造这些文物的人很少为它们的长期保存做好准备”,说明有形文物也会受到创作者忽视,A选项错误。
- B选项“以更直接的方式传递信息”,符合我们对文中内容的分析,B选项正确。
- C选项“需要更多有意的保存”,文中说“在创作时,并没有进行有意的保存,但模拟材料仍有机会留存”,说明有形文物不需要更多有意的保存,C选项错误。
- D选项“不太可能遭受严重损坏”,文中未提及有形文物和数字信息遭受损坏的可能性比较,D选项错误。
第3题
- 解题思路:第三段提到图书馆员将有形物品数字化,让全球研究人员能快速搜索和获取馆藏,结果是历史资源丰富,但也带来了问题。用户认为所有信息都在手机里,认为图书馆对研究人员不再那么重要,这意味着图书馆员的工作可能导致图书馆被低估。
- 解析:
- A选项“材料供应过剩”,文中说的是“历史资源丰富带来了大海捞针的问题”,并非材料供应过剩,A选项错误。
- B选项“图书馆被低估”,与我们分析的结果一致,B选项正确。
- C选项“研究人员表现不佳”,文中未提及研究人员表现问题,C选项错误。
- D选项“用户过度依赖技术”,文章重点是图书馆员工作对图书馆价值的影响,而非用户对技术的依赖,D选项错误。
第4题
- 解题思路:文中提到“随着技术进步和格式过时,物品就会变得无用”,并以ZIP磁盘为例,当人们看着ZIP磁盘却不知道如何取出文件时,说明旧格式可能导致信息丢失。
- 解析:
- A选项“通过非常规手段检索文件的危险”,文中未提及检索文件的危险,A选项错误。
- B选项“不断迁移数字资产的不可行性”,文中未提及迁移数字资产的不可行性,B选项错误。
- C选项“旧格式中信息丢失的可能性”,符合我们对ZIP磁盘例子的分析,C选项正确。
- D选项“在模拟设备上存储信息的不便”,ZIP磁盘是数字存储设备,并非模拟设备,D选项错误。
第5题
- 解题思路:文章开篇引出数字信息保存问题,接着阐述数字信息比模拟信息需要更多的关注,保存数字信息面临诸多挑战,如格式过时信息丢失等。最后提到图书馆员在数字信息保存方面的作用,但也指出目前没有全面的保存解决方案。所以文章核心是数字历史记录保存的挑战。
- 解析:
- A选项“应该努力保存文物”,文章重点是数字信息保存,而非文物保存,A选项错误。
- B选项“应该认可图书馆员的贡献”,虽然提到了图书馆员的作用,但这不是文章的核心,文章核心是数字信息保存挑战,B选项错误。
- C选项“访问数据库对研究人员至关重要”,文章未强调访问数据库的重要性,C选项错误。
- D选项“保存数字历史记录是一个挑战”,符合文章核心内容,D选项正确。