题目
The Later Stone Age technology was thought to have made its first appearance in South Africa much later than it did in Europe. A new analysis of South African finds suggests modern culture emerged in both areas at the same time. In Europe, the Later Stone Age is commonly dated to around 45,000 years ago. In South Africa there is archeological (考古学的) evidence suggesting the Later Stone Age did not begin until much later – around 22,000 years ago.Perhaps no longer, though. Paola Villa of the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History in Boulder, and her colleagues, have explored deep into the layers of Border Cave in South Africa, and found that Middle Stone Age tool-making techniques were giving way to Later Stone Age technology by 44,000 years ago. For instance, stone spear points – a mark of Middle Stone Age technology – were replaced by bows and bone arrows. A companion paper, headed by Francesco d’Errico of the University of Bordeaux, France, found organic evidence that pointed to a similar date, probably representing the beginning of the modern-day hunter-gatherer society in South Africa.The Border Cave evidence also shows a striking trend of internal evolution. Though Later Stone Age technologies could theoretically have spread rapidly to the north and south from a source in East Africa, Villa’s evidence suggests otherwise. The South African finds suggest a gradual shift into the Later Stone Age, while retaining a few elements from earlier times in the form of notched (刻V字形切口的) bones, bone awls (锥子) and marine shell beads (珠子). That points to the South African populations evolving many of their later tools independently. “To prove internal evolution, you need a place like Border Cave that has a long sequence, many layers, is well dated, and all use the same materials to make artefacts (人工制品),”says Villa.1. Which of the following is true about Later Stone Age according to the passage?A) It appeared in South Africa much later than it did in Europe.B) It appeared approximately the same time in both South Africa and Europe. C) It appeared 22,000 years later in Europe than that in South Africa.D) It did not begin in South Africa 22,000 years ago as it did in Europe.2. Which of the following is a symbol of Middle Stone Age technology?A) Bows and bone arrows.B) Caves.C) Hunting techniques.D) Stone spear points. 3. Which of the following is true regarding the study of Francesco d’Errico according to the passage?A) It examined the layers of Border Cave in South Africa.B) It provided further evidence for the conclusion made by Paola Villa. C) It revealed the differences between Middle Stone Age technology and Later Stone Age technology.D) It suggested that the modern-day hunter-gatherer society in South Africa appeared earlier than it did in Europe.4. What does the evidence of the Border Cave suggest?A) South Africa did not shift rapidly from earlier times into the Later Stone Age. B) Later Stone Age technologies had spread quickly to other areas from the source.C) The South African populations were reluctant to evolve their tools with the help of Later Stone Age technology.D) The Border Cave was a perfect place to retain a few elements from earlier times.5. Which of the following could be the best title for this passage?A) Later Stone Age got earlier start in South Africa than thought. B) The Border Cave, a perfect place for internal evolution.C) Later Stone Age technology in Europe and South Africa.D) The Border Cave, a source of Later Stone Age technologies.
The Later Stone Age technology was thought to have made its first appearance in South Africa much later than it did in Europe. A new analysis of South African finds suggests modern culture emerged in both areas at the same time. In Europe, the Later Stone Age is commonly dated to around 45,000 years ago. In South Africa there is archeological (考古学的) evidence suggesting the Later Stone Age did not begin until much later – around 22,000 years ago.Perhaps no longer, though. Paola Villa of the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History in Boulder, and her colleagues, have explored deep into the layers of Border Cave in South Africa, and found that Middle Stone Age tool-making techniques were giving way to Later Stone Age technology by 44,000 years ago. For instance, stone spear points – a mark of Middle Stone Age technology – were replaced by bows and bone arrows. A companion paper, headed by Francesco d’Errico of the University of Bordeaux, France, found organic evidence that pointed to a similar date, probably representing the beginning of the modern-day hunter-gatherer society in South Africa.The Border Cave evidence also shows a striking trend of internal evolution. Though Later Stone Age technologies could theoretically have spread rapidly to the north and south from a source in East Africa, Villa’s evidence suggests otherwise. The South African finds suggest a gradual shift into the Later Stone Age, while retaining a few elements from earlier times in the form of notched (刻V字形切口的) bones, bone awls (锥子) and marine shell beads (珠子). That points to the South African populations evolving many of their later tools independently. “To prove internal evolution, you need a place like Border Cave that has a long sequence, many layers, is well dated, and all use the same materials to make artefacts (人工制品),”says Villa.1. Which of the following is true about Later Stone Age according to the passage?A) It appeared in South Africa much later than it did in Europe.B) It appeared approximately the same time in both South Africa and Europe. C) It appeared 22,000 years later in Europe than that in South Africa.D) It did not begin in South Africa 22,000 years ago as it did in Europe.2. Which of the following is a symbol of Middle Stone Age technology?A) Bows and bone arrows.B) Caves.C) Hunting techniques.D) Stone spear points. 3. Which of the following is true regarding the study of Francesco d’Errico according to the passage?A) It examined the layers of Border Cave in South Africa.B) It provided further evidence for the conclusion made by Paola Villa. C) It revealed the differences between Middle Stone Age technology and Later Stone Age technology.D) It suggested that the modern-day hunter-gatherer society in South Africa appeared earlier than it did in Europe.4. What does the evidence of the Border Cave suggest?A) South Africa did not shift rapidly from earlier times into the Later Stone Age. B) Later Stone Age technologies had spread quickly to other areas from the source.C) The South African populations were reluctant to evolve their tools with the help of Later Stone Age technology.D) The Border Cave was a perfect place to retain a few elements from earlier times.5. Which of the following could be the best title for this passage?A) Later Stone Age got earlier start in South Africa than thought. B) The Border Cave, a perfect place for internal evolution.C) Later Stone Age technology in Europe and South Africa.D) The Border Cave, a source of Later Stone Age technologies.
题目解答
答案
1、答案:B2、答案:D3、答案:B4、答案:A5、答案:A
解析
整体考察内容
本文围绕围绕“南非石器时代晚期技术的起始时间”展开,介绍了新研究对南非Border Cave的考古发现,修正了此前“南非石器时代晚期晚于欧洲”的观点,强调两地可能同期出现,并说明了相关技术演变证据。
题目详解
1. 关于石器时代晚期(Later Stone Age)的正确描述
- 选项A:出现在南非比欧洲晚很多**
原文首句提到“过去认为南非石器时代晚期比欧洲晚很多”,但新研究否定了这一点,故A错误。 - 选项B:在南非和欧洲几乎同时出现
第二段明确“新分析表明两地同期出现现代文化”,且Paola Villa的发现显示南非4.4万年前已开始过渡,与欧洲4.5万年前接近,故B正确。 - 选项C:欧洲比南非晚2.2万年
原文“欧洲约4.5万年前,南非曾认为2.2万”,但新发现推翻,且C时间逻辑反了,错误。 - 选项D:南非不是2.2万年前未开始,欧洲开始了
原文“曾认为南非2.2万前未开始”,但新发现显示更早,且D未体现新结论,错误。
2. 中石器时代(Middle Stone Age)技术的标志
- 选项D:石制矛头
第三段明确“石制矛头是中石器时代的标志,后被弓和骨箭取代”,故D正确。 - 选项A:弓和骨箭是石器时代晚期的技术,错误;B、C未提及,错误。
3. Francesco d’Errico的研究特点
选项B:为Paola Villa的结论提供进一步证据
第四段提到“ companion paper( companion paper指 companion paper,补充论文)”,且“发现有机证据指向相似日期”,即支持Villa的结论(4.4万年前过渡)提供了补充,故B正确。
- 选项A:研究Border Cave地层是Villa的研究,非d’Errico,错误;C、D未提及,错误。
4. Border Cave的证据表明
选项A:南非未快速从早期过渡到石器时代晚期
第五段“Border Cave证据显示 gradual shift(逐渐转变),而非 rapid spread(快速传播)”,故A正确。
- 选项B:技术从东非快速传播是被否定的观点,错误;C“不愿进化”未提;D“完美保留元素”是Villa对该洞穴的评价,非证据结论,错误。
5. 最佳标题
选项A:南非石器时代晚期开始时间早于此前认知
全文核心是“新发现推翻旧观点,南非石器时代晚期起始时间提前,与欧洲同期”,A准确概括;B仅Border Cave,非核心;C“两地技术”未突出“新发现修正时间”;D“来源”未提,错误。