The rapid expansion of AI has generated a heated global discussion on whether it will transform education. While some predict it as the future of tailored learning, others caution against its limits. As a result, people hold a mixed view of AI. It is seen as a helpful assistant, yet it remains an inadequate replacement for human teachers.Supporters of AI combination emphasize its game-changing power. AI tools support learning and teaching in key ways. They adapt to each student's pace, grade work instantly, and provide constant academic help. This tireless support frees teachers from routine tasks, allowing them to focus on personalized guidance, critical thinking, and building a positive classroom environment. At the same time, AI stimulates creativity. By presenting students with complex challenges, diverse problem-solving methods, and vast knowledge resources, it encourages exploration beyond traditional school subjects.However, the key argument against AI is the value of human connection. Education is not just a data transfer; it is a deeply human experience built on emotion, motivation, and social learning. An AI tool can identify a gap in knowledge but cannot detect the anxiety, boredom, or lack of confidence behind it. For instance, when a student's grade suddenly drops, an AI tool might only recommend more exercises. A teacher, however, might notice the student's sadness, discover a family problem, and offer comfort and practical help. This delicate understanding and shared humanity cannot be copied by a computer program. The guidance, the sudden curiosity lit by a passionate educator, and the growth of social skills among classmates are essential to overall development and stay beyond AI's reach.In conclusion, seeing the debate as "AI versus teachers" is mistaken. The future is not about replacement, but about working together. AI's strength is in processing information and personalizing content delivery. The teacher's strength is in developing wisdom, emotional intelligence, and creativity. The most hopeful educational model is a joint one. AI should be a powerful tool for teachers, to improve teaching rather than reduce the human touch in learning.32. How does the author present the topic in the first paragraph?A. By giving examples.B. By defining a concept.C. By quoting an expert.D. By stating a phenomenon.33. What do we know about the advantages of AI?A. AI's help is adjustable and instant.B. AI demonstrates shared humanity.C. AI directly teaches critical thinking.D. AI alone is a game-changing power.34. What's the purpose of the example in paragraph 3?A. To list a teacher's daily tasks.B. To show teachers' uniqueness.C. To display AI's role in improving grades.D. To argue the main cause of poor grades.35. Which of the following would the author most probably agree with?A. AI serves best as a support.B. AI can fully replace teachers.C. AI dominates future classrooms.D. AI weakens teachers' importance.
The rapid expansion of AI has generated a heated global discussion on whether it will transform education. While some predict it as the future of tailored learning, others caution against its limits. As a result, people hold a mixed view of AI. It is seen as a helpful assistant, yet it remains an inadequate replacement for human teachers.
Supporters of AI combination emphasize its game-changing power. AI tools support learning and teaching in key ways. They adapt to each student's pace, grade work instantly, and provide constant academic help. This tireless support frees teachers from routine tasks, allowing them to focus on personalized guidance, critical thinking, and building a positive classroom environment. At the same time, AI stimulates creativity. By presenting students with complex challenges, diverse problem-solving methods, and vast knowledge resources, it encourages exploration beyond traditional school subjects.
However, the key argument against AI is the value of human connection. Education is not just a data transfer; it is a deeply human experience built on emotion, motivation, and social learning. An AI tool can identify a gap in knowledge but cannot detect the anxiety, boredom, or lack of confidence behind it. For instance, when a student's grade suddenly drops, an AI tool might only recommend more exercises. A teacher, however, might notice the student's sadness, discover a family problem, and offer comfort and practical help. This delicate understanding and shared humanity cannot be copied by a computer program. The guidance, the sudden curiosity lit by a passionate educator, and the growth of social skills among classmates are essential to overall development and stay beyond AI's reach.
In conclusion, seeing the debate as "AI versus teachers" is mistaken. The future is not about replacement, but about working together. AI's strength is in processing information and personalizing content delivery. The teacher's strength is in developing wisdom, emotional intelligence, and creativity. The most hopeful educational model is a joint one. AI should be a powerful tool for teachers, to improve teaching rather than reduce the human touch in learning.
32. How does the author present the topic in the first paragraph?
A. By giving examples.
B. By defining a concept.
C. By quoting an expert.
D. By stating a phenomenon.
33. What do we know about the advantages of AI?
A. AI's help is adjustable and instant.
B. AI demonstrates shared humanity.
C. AI directly teaches critical thinking.
D. AI alone is a game-changing power.
34. What's the purpose of the example in paragraph 3?
A. To list a teacher's daily tasks.
B. To show teachers' uniqueness.
C. To display AI's role in improving grades.
D. To argue the main cause of poor grades.
35. Which of the following would the author most probably agree with?
A. AI serves best as a support.
B. AI can fully replace teachers.
C. AI dominates future classrooms.
D. AI weakens teachers' importance.