A professor of philosophy at the University of Nottingham once argued that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy” or other great books.Actually, there is such evidence. Two scholars, one being a psychologist at York University in Canada and the other being a professor of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto, reported their latest studies showing that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize (产生共鸣) with them and view the world from their perspective. This link persisted even after the researchers factored in the possibility that more empathetic individuals might choose to read more novels. A separate study conducted by the York University psychologist found a similar result in young children: the more stories they had read to them, the more empathetic they became.What do the latest studies of the two scholars mentioned in Para. 2 show?A. Reading fiction encourages people to be more persistent.B. Reading fiction helps people understand others better.C. Empathetic people have a better perspective on life.D. Empathetic people are more likely to read novels.
A professor of philosophy at the University of Nottingham once argued that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy” or other great books. Actually, there is such evidence. Two scholars, one being a psychologist at York University in Canada and the other being a professor of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto, reported their latest studies showing that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize (产生共鸣) with them and view the world from their perspective. This link persisted even after the researchers factored in the possibility that more empathetic individuals might choose to read more novels. A separate study conducted by the York University psychologist found a similar result in young children: the more stories they had read to them, the more empathetic they became. What do the latest studies of the two scholars mentioned in Para. 2 show? A. Reading fiction encourages people to be more persistent. B. Reading fiction helps people understand others better. C. Empathetic people have a better perspective on life. D. Empathetic people are more likely to read novels.
题目解答
答案
我们来一步一步分析这道题:
题干内容回顾:
题干中提到,一位哲学教授认为,我们不应该声称文学能够改善我们的人格,因为没有“令人信服的证据”表明读托尔斯泰等人的作品会让人在道德或社会层面变得更好。
然而,接下来的段落反驳了这个观点,指出:
> 两位学者(一位是加拿大约克大学的心理学家,另一位是多伦多大学的认知心理学教授)报告了他们的最新研究,表明经常阅读小说的人似乎更能理解他人、与他人产生共鸣,并从他人的角度看问题。
此外,还提到:
> 另一项由约克大学心理学家进行的研究发现,儿童被读的故事越多,他们就越有同理心。
问题分析:
问题是:
> What do the latest studies of the two scholars mentioned in Para. 2 show?
也就是:第二段中提到的两位学者的最新研究显示了什么?
选项分析:
A. Reading fiction encourages people to be more persistent.
(读小说鼓励人们更加坚持。)
→ 原文没有提到“坚持”这个概念,无关。
B. Reading fiction helps people understand others better.
(读小说帮助人们更好地理解他人。)
→ 这与原文中“better able to understand other people, empathize with them and view the world from their perspective”完全一致。✅
C. Empathetic people have a better perspective on life.
(有同理心的人对生活有更积极的看法。)
→ 原文没有提到“对生活有更积极的看法”,属于无中生有。
D. Empathetic people are more likely to read novels.
(有同理心的人更可能读小说。)
→ 虽然原文提到“研究者排除了这种可能性”,但这是被排除的解释,不是研究的结论。因此不是正确答案。
正确答案:
$\boxed{B}$