题目
3 Daniel has found a website article about fair play.Read the article-|||-below and answer the following questions.丹尼尔在网站上找到了一篇关于公-|||-平竞争的文章。阅读下面的文章并回答以下问题。-|||-与ot 与everything 连用表示部分否定-|||-赢并不是一切-|||-→两个what均引导宾语从句,从句中计作形式主语,不定式短语作-|||-We all know what it is like to want to win what it is like to lose.-|||-我们都知道 想要赢是什么感觉, 我们大多数人也知道输是什么感觉。-|||-More often than not winning has the victor walking on air ,lost in the glory-|||-胜利往往让成功者得意扬扬, 沉浸在当下的荣耀中,-|||-of the moment,while the loser is left with a bitter taste and a feeling of failure -|||-而留给失败者的只有苦涩的滋味和挫败感。-|||-i作形式主语,不定式短语tokeep...作真正的主语-|||-Almost nobody likes (d)^21 ,and sometimes it is difficult to keep everything-|||-几乎没有人喜欢屈居第二, 而且有时候很难正确客观地看待-|||-in Modern society honours winners and successful sportspeople-|||-这一切。 现代社会授予获胜者荣誉, 成功的运动员-|||-→过去分词短语作定语,修饰celebrities-|||-quickly become celebritie ^24,admired by all.However,there are ways to win and-|||-很快成为名人, 受到所有人的羡慕。然而, 赢得起也要输得起。-|||-ways to lose.Whether you come first or last,it is important to remember that at any-|||-无论你是第一名还是最后一名, 重要的是要记住, 在任何-|||-sporting event,you face two opponents your fellow competitors and yourself. 2-|||-体育赛事中, 你都面临着两个对手: 与你同场竞技的人和你自己。-|||-. mish ,your competitors will walk away you will have to live with-|||-比赛结束时, 你的竞争者会离开, 但你将必须接受-|||-your decisions.A true sportsperson will make the right sin i for the right reasons-|||-你的决定。 一位真正的运动员会用正确的理由做出正确的决定,-|||-过去分词短语作后置定语,修饰an old and very wise saying←-|||-and not worry about failure.There is an old and very wise saying,repeated many times,-|||-而不担心失败。 有一句古老而又非常明智的谚语, 重复了很多次,-|||-(1)W W With huminity bigcirc (30) ,lose with (e)^31 ,and do both with dignity-|||-"赢要谦虚, 输要优雅, 两者都要有尊严。"-|||-_(n)praise o(f)^bigcirc (33) such acts of sportsmanship,the Interna Fair Play Committee-|||-为表彰这些彰显体育精神的行为, 国际公平竞赛委员会-|||-"the+序数词+名词+不定式短语"结构,不定式短语作后置定语←-|||-decided to award the Pierre de Coubertin Fair Play Trophy,in 1964.The first athlete-|||-在1964年决定颁发皮埃尔·德·顾拜旦公平竞赛奖。 第一位-|||-to receive the award was an Italian bobsleigh named Eugenio Monti.-|||-获得该奖项的运动员是意大利的雪橇运动员欧金尼奥·蒙蒂。-|||-During the two-man bobsleigh final at the 1964 Winter Olympic Games,he-|||-在1964年冬奥会双人雪橇决赛中, 他-|||-produced an excellent time for his downhill run.One of the British competitors,-|||-在速降滑雪赛中创造了一个美妙的时刻。 其中一名英国选手-|||-Tony Nash,had broken a part of his bobsleigh and was unable to compete.Monti-|||-托尼·纳什的雪橇断了一部分, 无法参赛。 蒙蒂-|||-. aWaoce of bigcirc (35) this,and without hesitation (d)^37 the same part of his own-|||-意识到了这一点, 他毫不犹豫地把自己雪橇上同样的部分拆下来-|||-bobsleigh and lent it to his opponent.Nash and his partner went on to achieve a-|||-借给了对手。 纳什和他的搭档继续创造了-|||-record time and won the gold medal.Monti's remarkable, tan alpha (sin )^4(alpha )^4 decision-|||-纪录, 并赢得了金牌。 蒙蒂非凡、无私的决定在奥运会比赛的最后阶段,-|||-→不定式短语作后置定语,修饰decision-|||-to help a fellow competitor,in the final stage of an Olympic event,is an example to-|||-帮助了其他选手, 这是我们所有人的-|||-名词短语作主语补足语,再如:He went into the library a happy man.他兴高采-|||-烈地走进了图书馆。-|||-us all.He did not come first but he walked away a true hero.-|||-榜样。他不是第一个到达终点的,但他离开的时候是一个真正的英雄。-|||-1 Why does the author say"at any sporting event,you face two opponents"?-|||-为什么作者说"在任何体育赛事中,你都面临着两个对手"?-|||-__-|||-2 Why was Monti awarded the Pierre de Coubertin Fair Play Trophy?-|||-为什么蒙蒂被授予皮埃尔·德·顾拜旦公平竞赛奖?-|||-__-|||-p使用了虚拟语气,表示与现在事实相反-|||-3 Would you do the san ne if you were Monti? Why or why not?-|||-如果你是蒙蒂,你也会这么做吗?为什么或为什么不?

题目解答
答案

解析
考查要点:
- 隐喻理解:第一题需理解“两个对手”的隐喻意义,分析其表面与深层含义。
- 因果推断:第二题需结合文章细节,推断人物行为与奖项内涵的关联。
- 观点表达:第三题需联系文章主旨,结合自身价值观进行合理阐述。
解题核心:
- 关键句定位:通过关键词(如“opponents”“Fair Play Trophy”)快速定位相关段落。
- 逻辑梳理:第一题需拆分“对手”为外部竞争与自我要求;第二题需聚焦蒙蒂行为的体育道德属性;第三题需关联文章中“humility”“grace”“dignity”等核心价值。
第1题
问题:为什么作者说“在任何体育赛事中,你都面临着两个对手”?
解析:
- 表面对手:与你同场竞技的其他参赛者(fellow competitors),他们直接构成竞争关系。
- 内在对手:自己,需在赛后对自己的决定负责,需克服失败的消极情绪,保持正确心态。
答案整合:两个“对手”分别指向外部竞争和自我要求,强调比赛不仅是竞技,更是自我超越。
第2题
问题:为什么蒙蒂被授予公平竞赛奖?
解析:
- 行为分析:蒙蒂主动帮助对手修好雪橇,放弃自身优势,体现无私精神。
- 奖项内涵:文章明确指出该奖表彰“体育道德”(sportsmanship),而蒙蒂的行为正是对“谦逊获胜、优雅失败”的最好诠释。
答案整合:其行为超越了胜负,展现了真正的体育精神。
第3题
问题:你会像蒙蒂一样做吗?为什么?
解析:
- 价值判断:需结合文章中“尊严”“无私”等核心价值,说明个人选择的合理性。
- 对比分析:若选择否定,需解释竞争优先的理由;若肯定,需强调道德高于胜负。
答案整合:肯定回答需突出无私的道德意义,否定回答需体现竞争的必然性。