题目
If the ship is sinking, do you save yourself or risk your life to save others? The answer, it seems, depends on how long the sinking takes. If there’s enough time, you can switch from adrenalin (肾上腺素)-driven self-preservation (自我保护) to conscience (良知,良心)-driven self-sacrifice.The viewpoints come from a new comparison of survival data from the sinking of the Titanic in 1912 with the loss of 1517 lives out of 2207, and the sinking of the Lusitania three years later, which killed 1198 passengers out of 1949.The main difference between the two sinkings was time: it took two hours and 40 minutes for the Titanic to go down, while the Lusitania sank in just 18 minutes. The result: a huge difference in survivor descriptions.On the Lusitania, survival favored able-bodied men aged between 16 and 35, whose probability of surviving was 7.9 percent higher than that for all remaining passengers over 35 years old. On the Titanic, in contrast, the same group of men were 6.5 percent more likely to die than their elders. Children were 30.9 percent more likely to survive on the Titanic, compared with passengers over 35, while on the Lusitania children had no better survival chance.The main reason, according to Benno Torgler of Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia, is that simple adrenalin-driven survival instinct and bodily strength affected survival on the fast-sinking Lusitania. On the slow-sinking Titanic, by contrast, there was time for social norms of giving priority to women and children.Strikingly, women of all ages on the Titanic had a probability of survival 53 percent higher than for men, compared with an 11 percent higher chance of dying on the Lusitania.“People say you only care about yourself, but the analysis shows that people will sacrifice themselves,” says Torgler. “But time is crucial, because the elements that restart social interactions only emerge after time.”The results also support director James Cameron’s interpretation of events in his film Titanic – that wealth and social status regained its power after time, possibly through bribery (贿赂) or favors from the crew. First-class passengers on the Titanic had huge survival advantages unavailable on the Lusitania.1. What is the main idea of the passage?A) The human instinct in time of disaster.B) Men’s responsibilities in times of danger.C) Similarities and differences between two ship sinkings.D) Causes for passengers’ different behaviors in a ship sinking. 2. According to the passage, what is the main factor that affected people’s behavior in the sinking of the Titanic and the Lusitania?A) The time it took the ships to sink. B) The percentage of young passengers.C) The intensity of people’s survival instinct.D) The difference in wealth and social status.3. According to the passage, which of the following groups of passengers were more likely to survive on the Lusitania?A) Stronger men. B) Small children.C) Elderly women.D) Wealthy people.4. Which of the following statements is true according to Benno Torgler?A) In times of danger people are selfish and will not sacrifice themselves.B) In times of danger people will take care of others when given enough time. C) People on the Titanic were more caring in nature than those on the Lusitania.D) People on the Titanic had better social interactions than those on the Lusitania.5. What does the author mean by saying “First-class passengers on the Titanic had huge survival advantages non-existent on the Lusitania” in the last paragraph?A) The Titanic had a huge number of first-class passengers.B) The Lusitania offered no special service to first-class passengers.C) First-class passengers on the Lusitania were more ready to help others.D) First-class passengers on the Titanic received more help from the crew.
If the ship is sinking, do you save yourself or risk your life to save others? The answer, it seems, depends on how long the sinking takes. If there’s enough time, you can switch from adrenalin (肾上腺素)-driven self-preservation (自我保护) to conscience (良知,良心)-driven self-sacrifice.
The viewpoints come from a new comparison of survival data from the sinking of the Titanic in 1912 with the loss of 1517 lives out of 2207, and the sinking of the Lusitania three years later, which killed 1198 passengers out of 1949.
The main difference between the two sinkings was time: it took two hours and 40 minutes for the Titanic to go down, while the Lusitania sank in just 18 minutes. The result: a huge difference in survivor descriptions.
On the Lusitania, survival favored able-bodied men aged between 16 and 35, whose probability of surviving was 7.9 percent higher than that for all remaining passengers over 35 years old. On the Titanic, in contrast, the same group of men were 6.5 percent more likely to die than their elders. Children were 30.9 percent more likely to survive on the Titanic, compared with passengers over 35, while on the Lusitania children had no better survival chance.
The main reason, according to Benno Torgler of Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia, is that simple adrenalin-driven survival instinct and bodily strength affected survival on the fast-sinking Lusitania. On the slow-sinking Titanic, by contrast, there was time for social norms of giving priority to women and children.
Strikingly, women of all ages on the Titanic had a probability of survival 53 percent higher than for men, compared with an 11 percent higher chance of dying on the Lusitania.
“People say you only care about yourself, but the analysis shows that people will sacrifice themselves,” says Torgler. “But time is crucial, because the elements that restart social interactions only emerge after time.”
The results also support director James Cameron’s interpretation of events in his film Titanic – that wealth and social status regained its power after time, possibly through bribery (贿赂) or favors from the crew. First-class passengers on the Titanic had huge survival advantages unavailable on the Lusitania.1. What is the main idea of the passage?A) The human instinct in time of disaster.B) Men’s responsibilities in times of danger.C) Similarities and differences between two ship sinkings.D) Causes for passengers’ different behaviors in a ship sinking. 2. According to the passage, what is the main factor that affected people’s behavior in the sinking of the Titanic and the Lusitania?A) The time it took the ships to sink. B) The percentage of young passengers.C) The intensity of people’s survival instinct.D) The difference in wealth and social status.3. According to the passage, which of the following groups of passengers were more likely to survive on the Lusitania?A) Stronger men. B) Small children.C) Elderly women.D) Wealthy people.4. Which of the following statements is true according to Benno Torgler?A) In times of danger people are selfish and will not sacrifice themselves.B) In times of danger people will take care of others when given enough time. C) People on the Titanic were more caring in nature than those on the Lusitania.D) People on the Titanic had better social interactions than those on the Lusitania.5. What does the author mean by saying “First-class passengers on the Titanic had huge survival advantages non-existent on the Lusitania” in the last paragraph?A) The Titanic had a huge number of first-class passengers.B) The Lusitania offered no special service to first-class passengers.C) First-class passengers on the Lusitania were more ready to help others.D) First-class passengers on the Titanic received more help from the crew.
题目解答
答案
1、答案:D2、答案:A3、答案:A4、答案:B5、答案:D
解析
文章主题与核心信息
文章通过对比泰坦尼克号(Titanic,下沉2小时40分钟)和卢西塔尼亚号(Lusitania,下沉18分钟)的幸存者数据,探讨沉船事件中乘客行为差异的原因,核心结论是:下沉时间的长短影响了人类行为——短时间内依赖肾上腺素驱动的自我保护(体力优势),长时间内则转向良知驱动的社会规范(优先妇女儿童、财富/地位影响)。
题目解析
1. 主旨大意题(第1题)
文章开篇提出问题“沉船时自救还是救人”,随后通过两起沉船案例的对比,揭示不同沉船情况下乘客行为差异的原因(时间导致的本能与社会规范的切换)。
- A选项“灾难中的人类本能”仅涉及部分内容,未涵盖社会规范的影响;
- B选项“危险中男性的责任”未提及;
- C选项“两次沉船的异同”是手段,非目的(文章重点是“差异的原因”);
- D选项“沉船中乘客不同行为的原因”准确概括核心。
2. 主要影响因素(第2题)
文章明确指出两起沉船的“主要差异是时间”:卢泰坦有条泰坦尼克号下沉慢,有时间践行社会规范;卢西塔尼亚号下沉快,仅靠体力和本能。
- A选项“沉船时间”直接对应核心差异;
- B选项“年轻乘客比例”未提及;
- C选项“生存本能强度”是时间导致的结果,非主因;
- D选项“财富和地位差异”是泰坦尼克号的次要因素,非两船的主要差异。
3. 卢西塔尼亚号幸存者群体(第3题)
根据文章:“On the Lusitania, survival favored able-bodied men aged between 16 and 35”(卢西塔尼亚号上,16-35岁的健壮男性存活率更高)。
- A选项“更强壮的男性”符合描述;
- B选项“小孩”在卢西塔尼亚号“无更好生存机会”;
- C选项“老年女性”未提及优势;
- D选项“有钱人”的优势仅存在于泰坦尼克号。
4. Benno Torgler的观点(第4题)
Torgler指出:“People will sacrifice themselves… But time is crucial”(人们会牺牲自己,但时间是关键,只有时间足够才会重启社会互动)。
- A选项“危险时自私不牺牲”与原文相反;
- B选项“给够时间会照顾他人”符合“time is crucial”的观点;
- C选项“泰坦尼克乘客更有爱心”是结果,非Torgler的核心观点(核心是“时间的作用”);
- D选项“泰坦尼克乘客社交更好”未提及,原文是“社会规范涌现”。
5. 头等舱乘客的生存优势(第5题)
文章最后提到:“wealth and social status regained its power after time, possibly through bribery or favors from the crew”(时间充裕后,财富和地位通过贿赂或船员偏袒发挥作用)。
- A选项“泰坦尼克头等舱人数多”未提及;
- B选项“卢西塔尼亚无特殊服务”非重点,重点是“泰坦尼克有”;
- C选项“卢西塔尼亚头等舱更乐于助人”未提及;
- D选项“泰坦尼克头等舱从船员处获更多帮助”符合“bribery or favors from the crew”的解释。