题目
When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually think about the Federal agents. But the private sector outdoes(超越) the government every time. It's Linda Tripp, not the FBI, who is facing charges under Maryland's laws against secret telephone taping. It's our banks, not the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), that pass our private financial data to telemarketing(电话营销) firms. Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators(立法者) lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually(事实上) at will. As an example of what's going on, consider U.S. Bancorp, which was recently sued(控告) for deceptive (欺诈性的)practices by the state of Minnesota. According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits. With these customer lists in hand, Member Works started dialing for dollars - selling dental plans, videogames, computer software and other products and services. Customers who accepted a "free trial offer" had 30 days to cancel. If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share(股份) of the revenues(收入). Customers were doubly deceived, the lawsuit claims. They didn't know that the bank was giving account numbers to Member Works. And if customers asked, they were led to think the answer was no. The state sued Member Works separately for deceptive selling. The company defends that it did anything wrong. For its part, U.S. Bancorp settled without admitting any mistakes. But it agreed to stop exposing its customers to non-financial products sold by outside firms. A few top banks decided to do the same. Many other banks will still do business with Member Works and similar firms. And banks will still be mining(开采) data from your account in order to sell you financial products, including things of little value, such as credit insurance and credit-card protection plans. You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields (保护)"transaction(交易;办理) and experience" information - mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts. Social Security numbers are for sale by private firms. They've generally agreed not to sell to the public. But to businesses, the numbers are an open book. Self-regulation doesn't work. A firm might publish a privacy-protection policy, but who enforces(实施) it? Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to Member Works. The bank even claims that it doesn't "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps(收获) a profit. Now you know.(1)Contrary to popular belief, the author finds that spying on people's privacy ____ .A. is mainly carried out by means of secret tapingB. has been intensified with the help of the IRSC. is practiced exclusively(独自的) by the FBID. is more prevalent(流行的;普遍的) in business circles(2)We know from the passage that ____ .A. legislators are acting to pass a law to provide better privacy protectionB. most states are turning a blind eye to the deceptive practices of private businessesC. the state of Minnesota is considering drawing up laws to protect private informationD. lawmakers are inclined to give a free hand to businesses to inquire into customers' buying habits(3)When the "free trial" deadline is over, you'll be charged without notice for a product or service if ____ .A. you fail to cancel it within the specified periodB. you happen to reveal your credit card numberC. you find the product or service unsatisfactoryD. you fail to apply for extension of the deadline(4)Businesses do not regard information concerning personal bank accounts as private because ____ .A. its revelation will do no harm to consumers under the current protection policyB. it is considered "transaction and experience" information unprotected by lawC. it has always been considered an open secret by the general publicD. its sale can be brought under control through self-regulation(5)We can infer from the passage that ____ .A. banks will have to change their ways of doing businessB. privacy protection laws will soon be enforcedC. consumers' privacy will continue to be invadedD. "free trial" practice will eventually be banned
When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually think about the Federal agents. But the private sector outdoes(超越) the government every time. It's Linda Tripp, not the FBI, who is facing charges under Maryland's laws against secret telephone taping. It's our banks, not the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), that pass our private financial data to telemarketing(电话营销) firms.
Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators(立法者) lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually(事实上) at will. As an example of what's going on, consider U.S. Bancorp, which was recently sued(控告) for deceptive (欺诈性的)practices by the state of Minnesota. According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.
With these customer lists in hand, Member Works started dialing for dollars - selling dental plans, videogames, computer software and other products and services. Customers who accepted a "free trial offer" had 30 days to cancel. If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share(股份) of the revenues(收入). Customers were doubly deceived, the lawsuit claims. They didn't know that the bank was giving account numbers to Member Works. And if customers asked, they were led to think the answer was no.
The state sued Member Works separately for deceptive selling. The company defends that it did anything wrong. For its part, U.S. Bancorp settled without admitting any mistakes. But it agreed to stop exposing its customers to non-financial products sold by outside firms. A few top banks decided to do the same. Many other banks will still do business with Member Works and similar firms.
And banks will still be mining(开采) data from your account in order to sell you financial products, including things of little value, such as credit insurance and credit-card protection plans. You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields (保护)"transaction(交易;办理) and experience" information - mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts. Social Security numbers are for sale by private firms. They've generally agreed not to sell to the public. But to businesses, the numbers are an open book. Self-regulation doesn't work. A firm might publish a privacy-protection policy, but who enforces(实施) it?
Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to Member Works. The bank even claims that it doesn't "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps(收获) a profit. Now you know.
(1)Contrary to popular belief, the author finds that spying on people's privacy ____ .
A. is mainly carried out by means of secret taping
B. has been intensified with the help of the IRS
C. is practiced exclusively(独自的) by the FBI
D. is more prevalent(流行的;普遍的) in business circles
(2)We know from the passage that ____ .
A. legislators are acting to pass a law to provide better privacy protection
B. most states are turning a blind eye to the deceptive practices of private businesses
C. the state of Minnesota is considering drawing up laws to protect private information
D. lawmakers are inclined to give a free hand to businesses to inquire into customers' buying habits
(3)When the "free trial" deadline is over, you'll be charged without notice for a product or service if ____ .
A. you fail to cancel it within the specified period
B. you happen to reveal your credit card number
C. you find the product or service unsatisfactory
D. you fail to apply for extension of the deadline
(4)Businesses do not regard information concerning personal bank accounts as private because ____ .
A. its revelation will do no harm to consumers under the current protection policy
B. it is considered "transaction and experience" information unprotected by law
C. it has always been considered an open secret by the general public
D. its sale can be brought under control through self-regulation
(5)We can infer from the passage that ____ .
A. banks will have to change their ways of doing business
B. privacy protection laws will soon be enforced
C. consumers' privacy will continue to be invaded
D. "free trial" practice will eventually be banned
Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators(立法者) lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually(事实上) at will. As an example of what's going on, consider U.S. Bancorp, which was recently sued(控告) for deceptive (欺诈性的)practices by the state of Minnesota. According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.
With these customer lists in hand, Member Works started dialing for dollars - selling dental plans, videogames, computer software and other products and services. Customers who accepted a "free trial offer" had 30 days to cancel. If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share(股份) of the revenues(收入). Customers were doubly deceived, the lawsuit claims. They didn't know that the bank was giving account numbers to Member Works. And if customers asked, they were led to think the answer was no.
The state sued Member Works separately for deceptive selling. The company defends that it did anything wrong. For its part, U.S. Bancorp settled without admitting any mistakes. But it agreed to stop exposing its customers to non-financial products sold by outside firms. A few top banks decided to do the same. Many other banks will still do business with Member Works and similar firms.
And banks will still be mining(开采) data from your account in order to sell you financial products, including things of little value, such as credit insurance and credit-card protection plans. You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields (保护)"transaction(交易;办理) and experience" information - mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts. Social Security numbers are for sale by private firms. They've generally agreed not to sell to the public. But to businesses, the numbers are an open book. Self-regulation doesn't work. A firm might publish a privacy-protection policy, but who enforces(实施) it?
Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to Member Works. The bank even claims that it doesn't "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps(收获) a profit. Now you know.
(1)Contrary to popular belief, the author finds that spying on people's privacy ____ .
A. is mainly carried out by means of secret taping
B. has been intensified with the help of the IRS
C. is practiced exclusively(独自的) by the FBI
D. is more prevalent(流行的;普遍的) in business circles
(2)We know from the passage that ____ .
A. legislators are acting to pass a law to provide better privacy protection
B. most states are turning a blind eye to the deceptive practices of private businesses
C. the state of Minnesota is considering drawing up laws to protect private information
D. lawmakers are inclined to give a free hand to businesses to inquire into customers' buying habits
(3)When the "free trial" deadline is over, you'll be charged without notice for a product or service if ____ .
A. you fail to cancel it within the specified period
B. you happen to reveal your credit card number
C. you find the product or service unsatisfactory
D. you fail to apply for extension of the deadline
(4)Businesses do not regard information concerning personal bank accounts as private because ____ .
A. its revelation will do no harm to consumers under the current protection policy
B. it is considered "transaction and experience" information unprotected by law
C. it has always been considered an open secret by the general public
D. its sale can be brought under control through self-regulation
(5)We can infer from the passage that ____ .
A. banks will have to change their ways of doing business
B. privacy protection laws will soon be enforced
C. consumers' privacy will continue to be invaded
D. "free trial" practice will eventually be banned
题目解答
答案
1.D.细节理解题题.根据第一段中"It's Linda Tripp, not the FBI, who is facing charges under Maryland's laws against secret telephone taping. It's our banks, not the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), that pass our private financial data to telemarketing firms.是琳达•特里普,而不是联邦调查局,根据马里兰州的法律,他们正面临着反对秘密电话录音的指控.是我们的银行,而不是国税局,把我们的私人财务数据传递给了电话营销公司.由此可判断出正是银行等金融机构在泄露我们的隐私.结合选项,故选D.
2.D.细节理解题.根据第第二段内容,Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators(立法者) lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually(事实上) at will…According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.消费者活动家正在向国会施压,要求更好的隐私法,但迄今为止还没有取得任何成果.立法者倾向于让商界人士随意跟踪我们的财务习惯…根据诉讼,该银行向一个名为"会员工作"的电话营销商提供敏感的客户数据,如姓名、电话号码、银行账户和信用卡号码、社会保险号码、账户余额和信用额度.可以判断出针对商家在消费者方面的信息获取法律方面没有限定,结合选项,故选D.
3.A.细节理解题.根据第第四段中"If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share of the revenues",可以判断出金融机构会利用时间上的限定来获取利益,故选A.
4. B.细节理解题. 根据第八段中"You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields "transaction and experience" information-mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts.你几乎没有任何保护措施来保护那些利用你的个人账户牟利的企业.例如,没有联邦法律保护"交易和经验"信息,主要是你的银行和信用卡账户的详细信息."可以判断出商家之所以不认定个人信息作为隐私主要是因为法律上没有支持, 故B正确.
5.C.推理题.根据文章最后一段内容,Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to Member Works. The bank even claims that it doesn't "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps(收获) a profit. Now you know.再拿美国银行公司为例.客户被书面告知,"你提供给我们的所有个人信息都将被视为机密信息."然后,它将你的数据出售给会员公司.银行甚至声称它根本不"出售"你的数据.它只"分享"数据并获得利润.现在你知道了你的个人信息是如何被泄露的了,如果不采取严密的法律保护措施,客人的资料将会被继泄露,被继续侵犯.结合选项,故选C.
2.D.细节理解题.根据第第二段内容,Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators(立法者) lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually(事实上) at will…According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.消费者活动家正在向国会施压,要求更好的隐私法,但迄今为止还没有取得任何成果.立法者倾向于让商界人士随意跟踪我们的财务习惯…根据诉讼,该银行向一个名为"会员工作"的电话营销商提供敏感的客户数据,如姓名、电话号码、银行账户和信用卡号码、社会保险号码、账户余额和信用额度.可以判断出针对商家在消费者方面的信息获取法律方面没有限定,结合选项,故选D.
3.A.细节理解题.根据第第四段中"If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share of the revenues",可以判断出金融机构会利用时间上的限定来获取利益,故选A.
4. B.细节理解题. 根据第八段中"You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields "transaction and experience" information-mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts.你几乎没有任何保护措施来保护那些利用你的个人账户牟利的企业.例如,没有联邦法律保护"交易和经验"信息,主要是你的银行和信用卡账户的详细信息."可以判断出商家之所以不认定个人信息作为隐私主要是因为法律上没有支持, 故B正确.
5.C.推理题.根据文章最后一段内容,Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to Member Works. The bank even claims that it doesn't "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps(收获) a profit. Now you know.再拿美国银行公司为例.客户被书面告知,"你提供给我们的所有个人信息都将被视为机密信息."然后,它将你的数据出售给会员公司.银行甚至声称它根本不"出售"你的数据.它只"分享"数据并获得利润.现在你知道了你的个人信息是如何被泄露的了,如果不采取严密的法律保护措施,客人的资料将会被继泄露,被继续侵犯.结合选项,故选C.