Across the rich world, well-educated people increasingly work longer than the less-skilled. Some 65% of American men aged 62-74 with a professional degree are in the workforce, compared with 32% of men with only a high-school certificate. This gap is part of a deepening divide between the well-educated well-off and the unskilled poor. Rapid technological advance has raised the incomes of the highly skilled while squeezing those of the unskilled. The consequences, for individuals and society, are profound. The world is facing an astonishing rise in the number of old people. And they will live longer than ever before. Over the next 20 years the global population of those aged 65 or more will almost double, from 600 million to 1.1 billion. The experience of the 20th century, when greater longevity (长寿) translated into more years in retirement rather than more years at work, has persuaded many observers that this shift will lead to slower economic growth, while the swelling ranks of pensioners will create government budget problems. But the notion of a sharp division between the working young and the idle old misses a new trend, the growing gap between the skilled and the unskilled. Employment rates are falling among younger unskilled people, whereas older skilled folk are working longer. The divide is most extreme in America, where well-educated baby-boomers (二战后生育高峰期出生的美国人) are putting off retirement while many less-skilled younger people have dropped out of the workforce. Policy is partly responsible. Many European governments have abandoned policies that used to encourage people to retire early. Rising life expectancy(预期寿命), combined with the replacement of generous defined-benefit pension plans with less generous defined-contribution ones, means that even the better-off must work longer to have a comfortable retirement. But the changing nature of work also plays a big role. Pay has risen sharply for the highly educated, and those people continue to reap rich rewards into old age because these days the educated elderly are more productive than the preceding generation. Technological change may well reinforce that shift: the skills that complement computers, from management knowhow to creativity, do not necessarily decline with age.【小题】(1) What has helped deepen the divide between the well-off and the poor?A.Longer life expectancies.B.A rapid technological advance.C.Profound changes in the workforce.D.A growing number of the well-educated.【小题】(2) What do many observers predict in view of the experience of the 20th century?A.Economic growth will slow down.B.Government budgets will increase.C.More people will try to pursue higher education.D.There will be more competition in the job market.【小题】(3) What is the result of policy changes in European countries?A.Unskilled workers may choose to retire early.B.More people have to receive in-service training.C.Even wealthy people must work longer to live comfortably in retirement.D.People may be able to enjoy generous defined-benefits from pension plans.【小题】(4) What is characteristic of work in the 21st century?A.Computers will do more complicated work.B.More will be taken by the educated young.C.Most jobs to be done will be creative ones.D.Skills are highly valued regardless of age.
Across the rich world, well-educated people increasingly work longer than the less-skilled. Some 65% of American men aged 62-74 with a professional degree are in the workforce, compared with 32% of men with only a high-school certificate. This gap is part of a deepening divide between the well-educated well-off and the unskilled poor. Rapid technological advance has raised the incomes of the highly skilled while squeezing those of the unskilled. The consequences, for individuals and society, are profound.
The world is facing an astonishing rise in the number of old people. And they will live longer than ever before. Over the next 20 years the global population of those aged 65 or more will almost double, from 600 million to 1.1 billion. The experience of the 20th century, when greater longevity (长寿) translated into more years in retirement rather than more years at work, has persuaded many observers that this shift will lead to slower economic growth, while the swelling ranks of pensioners will create government budget problems.
But the notion of a sharp division between the working young and the idle old misses a new trend, the growing gap between the skilled and the unskilled. Employment rates are falling among younger unskilled people, whereas older skilled folk are working longer. The divide is most extreme in America, where well-educated baby-boomers (二战后生育高峰期出生的美国人) are putting off retirement while many less-skilled younger people have dropped out of the workforce.
Policy is partly responsible. Many European governments have abandoned policies that used to encourage people to retire early. Rising life expectancy(预期寿命), combined with the replacement of generous defined-benefit pension plans with less generous defined-contribution ones, means that even the better-off must work longer to have a comfortable retirement. But the changing nature of work also plays a big role. Pay has risen sharply for the highly educated, and those people continue to reap rich rewards into old age because these days the educated elderly are more productive than the preceding generation. Technological change may well reinforce that shift: the skills that complement computers, from management knowhow to creativity, do not necessarily decline with age.
【小题】(1) What has helped deepen the divide between the well-off and the poor?
A.Longer life expectancies.B.A rapid technological advance.C.Profound changes in the workforce.D.A growing number of the well-educated.
【小题】(2) What do many observers predict in view of the experience of the 20th century?
A.Economic growth will slow down.B.Government budgets will increase.C.More people will try to pursue higher education.D.There will be more competition in the job market.
【小题】(3) What is the result of policy changes in European countries?
A.Unskilled workers may choose to retire early.B.More people have to receive in-service training.C.Even wealthy people must work longer to live comfortably in retirement.D.People may be able to enjoy generous defined-benefits from pension plans.
【小题】(4) What is characteristic of work in the 21st century?
A.Computers will do more complicated work.B.More will be taken by the educated young.C.Most jobs to be done will be creative ones.D.Skills are highly valued regardless of age.
题目解答
答案
【答案】
| 【小题1】B | 【小题2】A | 【小题3】C | 【小题4】D |
解析
- 考查要点:本题主要考查学生对文章主旨、细节信息及逻辑关系的理解能力。需要结合上下文,准确提取关键信息并匹配选项。
- 解题核心:
- 第(1)题:明确“技术进步”如何通过收入分配影响社会分化。
- 第(2)题:抓住“历史经验推导未来趋势”的逻辑链。
- 第(3)题:理解政策调整(养老金改革)与个体行为(延迟退休)的因果关系。
- 第(4)题:提炼“技能价值与年龄无关”的隐含结论。
第(1)题
关键句:
Rapid technological advance has raised the incomes of the highly skilled while squeezing those of the unskilled.
- 技术进步直接导致高技能人群收入增长,低技能人群收入被压缩,从而加深贫富差距。
- 干扰项排除:A(寿命延长)和D(教育普及)是背景因素,非直接原因。
第(2)题
关键句:
many observers that this shift will lead to slower economic growth
- 20世纪“长寿=退休时间延长”的历史经验,推导出“经济增速放缓”的预测。
- 干扰项排除:C(追求教育)和D(就业竞争)未在文中提及。
第(3)题
关键句:
rising life expectancy...means that even the better-off must work longer to have a comfortable retirement
- 养老金计划从“固定收益”转为“缴费型”,叠加寿命延长,迫使高收入人群延迟退休。
- 干扰项排除:A(低技能早退休)与政策方向矛盾。
第(4)题
关键句:
the skills that complement computers...do not necessarily decline with age
- 技术变革使“与计算机互补的技能”(如管理、创造力)价值提升,且这些技能不随年龄衰退。
- 干扰项排除:B(年轻人主导)与文章“老年高技能人群延长工作”矛盾。