Do you ever blend up a protein drink for breakfast, or grab a protein bar following an afternoon workout? If so, you are likely among the millions of people in search of more protein-rich diets.Protein-enriched products are found everywhere. But contrary to all the publicity that everyone needs more protein, most Americans get twice as much as they need.Many of us living in the most developed countries are buying into a myth of protein deficiency created by food companies and self-identified health experts. Global retail sales of protein supplement products reached an astonishing US18.9 billion in 2020.But are we really in need of more protein? Physicians in the U.S. have never actually examined a patient with protein deficiency because simply by eating an adequate number of daily calories we are also most likely getting enough protein.In fact, Americans currently consume almost twice the National Academy of Medicine’s recommended daily intake of protein although the most desirable protein intake may vary depending on age and activity level.For example, if you’re a dedicated athlete you might need to consume higher quantities of protein. Generally, though, a 140-pound person should not exceed 120 grams of protein per day, particularly because a high protein diet can strain kidney and liver function and increase risks of developing heart disease and cancer.While fats and sugar have taken the beating in turns since over a century ago, protein has managed to remain our red-hot favorite.In the 1970s through the 1990s, protein products remained visible but moved back somewhat with the dietary spotlight firmly fixed on low-calorie, low-fat, sugar-free snack foods and beverages following the publication of studies linking sugar and saturated (饱和的) fat consumption to heart disease.Later research in 2003, however, suggested high-protein diets could aid in weight loss, and protein quickly regained its former nutrient-superstar status.Now most people living in high-income nations are consuming enough protein. When we replace meals with a protein bar or drink, we also risk missing out on the rich sources of antioxidants (抗氧化剂), vitamins and many other benefits of real food.51. What do we learn about publicity over protein in America?A) It has helped to create the myth of protein deficiency.B) It has helped Americans in search of protein-rich diets.C) It has raised a lot of health concerns among the public.D) It has been funded by food companies and health experts.
Do you ever blend up a protein drink for breakfast, or grab a protein bar following an afternoon workout? If so, you are likely among the millions of people in search of more protein-rich diets. Protein-enriched products are found everywhere. But contrary to all the publicity that everyone needs more protein, most Americans get twice as much as they need. Many of us living in the most developed countries are buying into a myth of protein deficiency created by food companies and self-identified health experts. Global retail sales of protein supplement products reached an astonishing US$18.9 billion in 2020. But are we really in need of more protein? Physicians in the U.S. have never actually examined a patient with protein deficiency because simply by eating an adequate number of daily calories we are also most likely getting enough protein. In fact, Americans currently consume almost twice the National Academy of Medicine’s recommended daily intake of protein although the most desirable protein intake may vary depending on age and activity level. For example, if you’re a dedicated athlete you might need to consume higher quantities of protein. Generally, though, a 140-pound person should not exceed 120 grams of protein per day, particularly because a high protein diet can strain kidney and liver function and increase risks of developing heart disease and cancer. While fats and sugar have taken the beating in turns since over a century ago, protein has managed to remain our red-hot favorite. In the 1970s through the 1990s, protein products remained visible but moved back somewhat with the dietary spotlight firmly fixed on low-calorie, low-fat, sugar-free snack foods and beverages following the publication of studies linking sugar and saturated (饱和的) fat consumption to heart disease. Later research in 2003, however, suggested high-protein diets could aid in weight loss, and protein quickly regained its former nutrient-superstar status. Now most people living in high-income nations are consuming enough protein. When we replace meals with a protein bar or drink, we also risk missing out on the rich sources of antioxidants (抗氧化剂), vitamins and many other benefits of real food. 51. What do we learn about publicity over protein in America? A) It has helped to create the myth of protein deficiency. B) It has helped Americans in search of protein-rich diets. C) It has raised a lot of health concerns among the public. D) It has been funded by food companies and health experts.
题目解答
答案
我们来一步步分析这道题。
题目:
51. What do we learn about publicity over protein in America?
(关于美国关于蛋白质的宣传,我们了解到了什么?)
选项分析:
A) It has helped to create the myth of protein deficiency.
(它帮助制造了蛋白质缺乏的神话。)
B) It has helped Americans in search of protein-rich diets.
(它帮助了那些在寻找高蛋白饮食的美国人。)
C) It has raised a lot of health concerns among the public.
(它在公众中引发了很多健康担忧。)
D) It has been funded by food companies and health experts.
(它是由食品公司和健康专家资助的。)
原文关键句分析:
文中有一句非常关键的话:
> "Many of us living in the most developed countries are buying into a myth of protein deficiency created by food companies and self-identified health experts."
这句话的意思是:
> “我们许多生活在最发达国家的人正在相信一个由食品公司和自封的健康专家制造的‘蛋白质缺乏’的神话。”
这句话直接指出了:
- “蛋白质缺乏”的观念是一个神话(myth);
- 这个神话是由食品公司和自称的健康专家(self-identified health experts)制造的;
- 这与“publicity over protein”(关于蛋白质的宣传)密切相关。
选项匹配分析:
-
A) It has helped to create the myth of protein deficiency.
✅ 正确。这正是文中明确提到的内容:宣传帮助制造了“蛋白质缺乏”的神话。 -
B) It has helped Americans in search of protein-rich diets.
❌ 错误。虽然文中提到很多人在寻找高蛋白饮食,但宣传的作用并不是“帮助”他们,而是误导他们相信自己缺乏蛋白质。 -
C) It has raised a lot of health concerns among the public.
❌ 错误。文中并没有说宣传引发了健康担忧,反而指出公众被误导了。 -
D) It has been funded by food companies and health experts.
❌ 错误。文中没有提到宣传是由谁资助的,只是说这个神话是食品公司和专家制造的。
结论:
正确答案是:
$\boxed{A}$
解析
考查要点:本题主要考查学生对文章核心观点的理解能力,需要结合上下文准确识别关键信息。
解题思路:题目询问关于美国蛋白质宣传的结论,需定位文章中直接描述宣传作用的句子。破题关键在于抓住“myth of protein deficiency”这一核心概念,明确其来源与影响。
关键句定位:
文中明确指出:“Many of us living in the most developed countries are buying into a myth of protein deficiency created by food companies and self-identified health experts.”
解析:
- “myth of protein deficiency”(蛋白质缺乏的神话)是宣传的核心内容,强调这一观念并非真实需求,而是人为制造的。
- “created by food companies and self-identified health experts”说明宣传的推动者,但题目问的是宣传的作用,因此需聚焦“帮助创造神话”这一结果。
选项辨析:
- A选项直接对应“helped to create the myth”,与原文一致。
- B选项混淆“帮助”与“误导”,文章批评过度追求蛋白质的行为,而非支持。
- C、D选项未提及宣传引发健康担忧或资金来源,属于干扰项。