When I was in middle school, a poisonous spider bit my right hand. I ran to my mom for help —but instead of taking me to a doctor, my mom set my hand on fire. After wrapping my hand with several layers of cotton, then soaking it in wine, she put a chopstick into my mouth, and ignited the cotton. Heat quickly penetrated the cotton and began to roast my hand. The pain made me want to scream, but the chopstick prevented it. All I could do was watch my hand burn —one minute, then two minutes— until mom put out the fire. You see, the part of China I grew up in was a rural village, and at that time preindustrial. When I was born, my village had no cars, no telephones, no electricity, and even no running water. And we certainly didn’t have access to modern medical resources. There was no doctor my mother could bring me to see about my spider bite. For those who study biology, you may have grasped the science behind my mom’s cure: heat deactivates(使失去活性) proteins, and a spider’s venom (毒液) is simply a form of protein. It’s cool how that folk remedy actually incorporates basic biochemistry, isn’t it? But I am a PhD student in biochemistry at Harvard, I now know that better, less painful and less risky treatments existed. So I can’t help but ask myself why I didn’t receive one at the time. Fifteen years have passed since that incident I am happy to report that my hand is fine. But this question lingers, and I continue to be troubled by it. We have learned to edit the human genome(基因组) and unlock many secrets of how cancer progresses. We can control neuronal activity literally with the switch of a light. Each year brings more advances in biomedical research—exciting, transformative accomplishments. Yet, despite the knowledge we have accumulated, we haven’ t been so successful in distributing it to where it’s needed most. According to the World Bank, twelve percent of the world’s population lives on less than 2 a day. Malnutrition kills more than 3 million children annually. Three hundred million people are suffering malaria globally. All over the world, we constantly see these problems of poverty, illness, and lack of resources preventing the flow of scientific information. Life-saving knowledge we take for granted in the modern world is often unavailable in these underdeveloped regions. And in far too many places, people are still essentially trying to cure a spider bite with fire. 1.How did the author’s mom cure him of the spider’s bite? A.She sent him to the nearby hospital immediately. B.She asked the neighbors for help. C.She wrapped the wound with cotton and burnt it. D.She let him drink some wine. 2.What was NOT the author’s hometown like? A.It was a backward village in China. B.It was an industrial rural village. C.It had no running water, telephones or cars. D.People there had no access to modern medical care. 3.Which of the following can replace the underlined word “incorporates” in Paragraph 3? A.includesB.resistsC.inspiresD.invents 4.What does the author want to do most? A.Change the unequal distribution of scientific knowledge. B.Discover more secrets to cancer. C.Bring more advances in biochemistry. D.Invent better and less painful treatments.
When I was in middle school, a poisonous spider bit my right hand. I ran to my mom for help —but instead of taking me to a doctor, my mom set my hand on fire. After wrapping my hand with several layers of cotton, then soaking it in wine, she put a chopstick into my mouth, and ignited the cotton. Heat quickly penetrated the cotton and began to roast my hand. The pain made me want to scream, but the chopstick prevented it. All I could do was watch my hand burn —one minute, then two minutes— until mom put out the fire.
You see, the part of China I grew up in was a rural village, and at that time preindustrial. When I was born, my village had no cars, no telephones, no electricity, and even no running water. And we certainly didn’t have access to modern medical resources. There was no doctor my mother could bring me to see about my spider bite.
For those who study biology, you may have grasped the science behind my mom’s cure: heat deactivates(使失去活性) proteins, and a spider’s venom (毒液) is simply a form of protein. It’s cool how that folk remedy actually incorporates basic biochemistry, isn’t it? But I am a PhD student in biochemistry at Harvard, I now know that better, less painful and less risky treatments existed. So I can’t help but ask myself why I didn’t receive one at the time.
Fifteen years have passed since that incident I am happy to report that my hand is fine. But this question lingers, and I continue to be troubled by it. We have learned to edit the human genome(基因组) and unlock many secrets of how cancer progresses. We can control neuronal activity literally with the switch of a light. Each year brings more advances in biomedical research—exciting, transformative accomplishments. Yet, despite the knowledge we have accumulated, we haven’ t been so successful in distributing it to where it’s needed most. According to the World Bank, twelve percent of the world’s population lives on less than $ 2 a day. Malnutrition kills more than 3 million children annually. Three hundred million people are suffering malaria globally. All over the world, we constantly see these problems of poverty, illness, and lack of resources preventing the flow of scientific information. Life-saving knowledge we take for granted in the modern world is often unavailable in these underdeveloped regions. And in far too many places, people are still essentially trying to cure a spider bite with fire.
1.How did the author’s mom cure him of the spider’s bite?
A.She sent him to the nearby hospital immediately.
B.She asked the neighbors for help.
C.She wrapped the wound with cotton and burnt it.
D.She let him drink some wine.
2.What was NOT the author’s hometown like?
A.It was a backward village in China.
B.It was an industrial rural village.
C.It had no running water, telephones or cars.
D.People there had no access to modern medical care.
3.Which of the following can replace the underlined word “incorporates” in Paragraph 3?
A.includes | B.resists | C.inspires | D.invents |
4.What does the author want to do most?
A.Change the unequal distribution of scientific knowledge.
B.Discover more secrets to cancer.
C.Bring more advances in biochemistry.
D.Invent better and less painful treatments.
题目解答
答案
1.C
2.B
3.A
4.A
解析
考查要点:本题为阅读理解题,主要考查学生对文章细节的理解、反选题的判断、词汇在上下文中的含义推断,以及对作者意图的把握。
解题思路:
- 细节题需定位原文对应段落,注意时间、动作顺序;
- 反选题需注意题目中的否定词(如“NOT”),结合文章描述排除干扰项;
- 词汇题需结合上下文理解词义,寻找同义替换;
- 主旨题需关注文章结尾段落,抓住作者反复强调的核心问题。
第1题
关键信息:文章第1段描述母亲用棉花包裹伤口、浸酒后点燃。
选项分析:
- C选项完整还原了文中步骤(棉花→浸酒→点燃),其他选项均与描述不符。
第2题
关键信息:第2段明确提到作者家乡是“preindustrial rural village”(前工业农村),且无现代医疗资源。
选项分析:
- B选项“工业农村”与“preindustrial”矛盾,为正确答案。
第3题
关键信息:第3段说明母亲的疗法“包含”了基础生物化学原理(蛋白质遇热失活)。
选项分析:
- A选项“includes”与“incorporates”同义,均表示“包含”。
第4题
关键信息:结尾段落强调科学知识分配不均是全球性问题,作者希望改变这一现状。
选项分析:
- A选项直接对应作者最后的呼吁,其他选项为已有成就或次要目标。