I've written this article and you're reading it. So we are members of the same club. We're both literate一we can read and write. And we both probably feel that literacy is essential to our lives. But millions of people all over the world are illiterate. Even in industrialized Western countries, such as the UK and the USA, approximately 20% of the population have "low literacy levels". But what exactly does that mean?My parents both left school at 14. They could read and write, but except for a quick look at the daily newspaper, reading and writing didn’t play a big part in their lives. There were very few books in the house. My mother was amazed because the woman who lived next door always wrote a list of what she needed before she went to the supermarket. Why couldn’t she remember? We laughed about that for weeks. Our family didn’t write lists! And when I was only 14 years old my father gave me an important letter that he'd written to the bank and asked me to check it for grammar and spelling mistakes. And there were quite a lot. He never usually wrote letters or postcards or even Christmas cards. So when he had to write he wasn't comfortable or confident. Does that mean that my father had a "low level of literacy"? I don't think so.There are lots of different definitions of literacy. Some experts define it as having the reading and writing skills that you need to be independent in your everyday life. So, for example, if you can read instructions, write a cheque, fill in a form, 一anything that you need to do in everyday life一then you are "functionally literate".Other people say that you are illiterate if you think that you are illiterate. In other words, if you feel that you can’t read or write as well as you would like to.If you live in a society where most people are literate then you will feel ashamed or embarrassed and avoid situations in which you have to read or write. The father of a friend of mine finally admitted to his family that he couldn't read when he was 45 years old. He bought the newspaper every day and pretended to read it一and believe it or not, his family had no idea.We often forget that writing is a recent invention. Many years ago, the word "literate" meant being able to communicate well in speaking, in other words what we now call "articulate". Story telling was an important activity in the past and still is today in some societies. Reading was often a cooperative activity一someone would read aloud to a group, often from a religious text such as the Koran or the Bible.Only a hundred years ago, in the United States, you were considered to be literate if you could sign your name to a piece of paper. It was an important skill. You were not allowed to vote if you couldn’t sign the voting register, so literacy was connected with political rights, and many people were excluded from the democratic process.Nowadays we see reading and writing as being connected, but that wasn’t so in the past. Many people could read, but not write. Writing was a skilled profession. If you needed something written then you paid an expert to write it for you.And of course, rich and important people have always employed people to write things for them. Important company bosses dictated letters to their secretaries or personal assistants. And now with new computer software you can dictate directly to your computer.Being illiterate can have a big effect on people’s lives. For example, a study in the UK showed that people who write and spell badly are seen as careless, immature and unreliable, and often unintelligent. So it is more difficult for them to find jobs, even when reading and writing are not necessary for the work.World-wide statistics show that literacy problems are associated with poverty and a lack of political power. More women than men are illiterate. Illiterate people have worse health, bigger families and are more likely to go to prison. So literacy campaigns must be a good thing. But don’t forget that an illiterate person, or someone with a low level of literacy, isn't necessarily stupid or ignorant — and may not be unhappy at all. Knowledge and wisdom isn't only found in writing.【1】Why does the author give two examples in Para 2?A. To show that Father was more literate than Mother.B. To show that literacy is interpreted in different ways.C. To indicate how important reading and writing are.D. To compare the level of literacy between neighbours.【2】According to the author, the following are some of the defining features of literacy EXCETT_____.A. independent B. psychological C. functional D. social【3】Which of the following statements about reading and writing is CORRECT?A. Reading and writing have always been regarded as equally difficult.B. People had to read and write well in order to be allowed to vote.C. Reading and writing have always been viewed as being connected.D. Reading often requires more immediate interaction than writing.【4】What do the last two paragraphs mainly focus on?A. Effects of illiteracy and employment problems.B. Effects of illiteracy on one’s personality development.C. Effects of illiteracy and associated problems.D. Effects of illiteracy on women’s career development.
I've written this article and you're reading it. So we are members of the same club. We're both literate一we can read and write. And we both probably feel that literacy is essential to our lives. But millions of people all over the world are illiterate. Even in industrialized Western countries, such as the UK and the USA, approximately 20% of the population have "low literacy levels". But what exactly does that mean?
My parents both left school at 14. They could read and write, but except for a quick look at the daily newspaper, reading and writing didn’t play a big part in their lives. There were very few books in the house. My mother was amazed because the woman who lived next door always wrote a list of what she needed before she went to the supermarket. Why couldn’t she remember? We laughed about that for weeks. Our family didn’t write lists! And when I was only 14 years old my father gave me an important letter that he'd written to the bank and asked me to check it for grammar and spelling mistakes. And there were quite a lot. He never usually wrote letters or postcards or even Christmas cards. So when he had to write he wasn't comfortable or confident. Does that mean that my father had a "low level of literacy"? I don't think so.
There are lots of different definitions of literacy. Some experts define it as having the reading and writing skills that you need to be independent in your everyday life. So, for example, if you can read instructions, write a cheque, fill in a form, 一anything that you need to do in everyday life一then you are "functionally literate".
Other people say that you are illiterate if you think that you are illiterate. In other words, if you feel that you can’t read or write as well as you would like to.
If you live in a society where most people are literate then you will feel ashamed or embarrassed and avoid situations in which you have to read or write. The father of a friend of mine finally admitted to his family that he couldn't read when he was 45 years old. He bought the newspaper every day and pretended to read it一and believe it or not, his family had no idea.
We often forget that writing is a recent invention. Many years ago, the word "literate" meant being able to communicate well in speaking, in other words what we now call "articulate". Story telling was an important activity in the past and still is today in some societies. Reading was often a cooperative activity一someone would read aloud to a group, often from a religious text such as the Koran or the Bible.
Only a hundred years ago, in the United States, you were considered to be literate if you could sign your name to a piece of paper. It was an important skill. You were not allowed to vote if you couldn’t sign the voting register, so literacy was connected with political rights, and many people were excluded from the democratic process.
Nowadays we see reading and writing as being connected, but that wasn’t so in the past. Many people could read, but not write. Writing was a skilled profession. If you needed something written then you paid an expert to write it for you.
And of course, rich and important people have always employed people to write things for them. Important company bosses dictated letters to their secretaries or personal assistants. And now with new computer software you can dictate directly to your computer.
Being illiterate can have a big effect on people’s lives. For example, a study in the UK showed that people who write and spell badly are seen as careless, immature and unreliable, and often unintelligent. So it is more difficult for them to find jobs, even when reading and writing are not necessary for the work.
World-wide statistics show that literacy problems are associated with poverty and a lack of political power. More women than men are illiterate. Illiterate people have worse health, bigger families and are more likely to go to prison. So literacy campaigns must be a good thing. But don’t forget that an illiterate person, or someone with a low level of literacy, isn't necessarily stupid or ignorant — and may not be unhappy at all. Knowledge and wisdom isn't only found in writing.
【1】Why does the author give two examples in Para 2?
A. To show that Father was more literate than Mother.
B. To show that literacy is interpreted in different ways.
C. To indicate how important reading and writing are.
D. To compare the level of literacy between neighbours.
【2】According to the author, the following are some of the defining features of literacy EXCETT_____.
A. independent B. psychological C. functional D. social
【3】Which of the following statements about reading and writing is CORRECT?
A. Reading and writing have always been regarded as equally difficult.
B. People had to read and write well in order to be allowed to vote.
C. Reading and writing have always been viewed as being connected.
D. Reading often requires more immediate interaction than writing.
【4】What do the last two paragraphs mainly focus on?
A. Effects of illiteracy and employment problems.
B. Effects of illiteracy on one’s personality development.
C. Effects of illiteracy and associated problems.
D. Effects of illiteracy on women’s career development.
题目解答
答案
【1】 B
【2】 A
【3】 D
【4】 C
解析
- 【第1题】 考查对作者举例意图的理解。需明确例子的作用是展示不同家庭对读写的态度,进而引出对“文盲”概念的多角度解读。
- 【第2题】 属于排除题,需结合文章对“文盲”定义的讨论,判断选项中哪一项不符合“文盲”的核心特征。
- 【第3题】 考查对历史语境中阅读与写作关系的辨析,需注意文章中关于读写分离的描述。
- 【第4题】 聚焦段落主旨,需理解最后两段强调文盲带来的多维度社会问题。
第1题
关键点:作者通过母亲与邻居写购物单的对比,以及父亲写信时的不自信,说明不同个体对读写的实际需求和能力差异。这两个例子并非单纯比较读写重要性,而是暗示“文盲”概念的复杂性。
- 选项B正确:例子展示了对“文盲”的不同解读方式(如邻居的“功能性文盲”与父亲的“心理抗拒”)。
- 其他选项错误:A、D混淆了家庭成员间的对比,C未抓住例子的核心意图。
第2题
关键点:文章指出“功能性文盲”(如能处理日常事务)与“心理文盲”(因自我认知而避免读写)的差异。定义中强调独立性、功能性、社会性,但未将“心理因素”作为核心特征。
- 选项A错误:“独立”是定义的一部分,但题目要求排除定义中的特征,故选A。
- 其他选项正确:B(心理)、C(功能)、D(社会)均属于定义中的维度。
第3题
关键点:文章提到过去阅读常是集体活动(如听人朗读宗教文本),而写作是专业技能,说明阅读比写作更强调即时互动。
- 选项D正确:“阅读需要更多互动”符合历史语境(如多人共听一人朗读)。
- 其他选项错误:A混淆难度,B混淆历史事实(仅需签名即可投票),C与历史情况矛盾。
第4题
关键点:最后两段分别讨论文盲对就业的影响(如被贴负面标签)和全球性关联问题(如贫困、健康、性别差异),综合体现文盲的多维效应。
- 选项C正确:两段均聚焦文盲带来的综合社会问题。
- 其他选项片面:A、B、D均只涉及单一维度。