People in business often make decisions based on their own personal feelings or instincts. It is quite horrifying to see people being guided by some unknown force. But how wise is it, really, to let your instincts drive your decisions? In the decision-making process, relying on instincts only makes sense when you have a vast experience to support you. Simply“feeling"that something is right or should be done is highly subjective and can drown you. On the other hand, there is a more rational approach to making decisions. Data and analysis have long been associated with informed decisions. These reduce the likelihood of errors and increase the chances of success. Big, systematic data is mostly the foundation of most of our decisions, personal and business alike. But with its extreme usability comes a complication:what do you do if you strongly feel something should not be done, even if the data insists that it should? This seemingly easy question is what drives the need to understand the relationship between instincts and data in the decision-making process. Without making things complicated, the solution to this dilemma is using data and instincts in conjunction to arrive at the best possible decisions. Instinctive decisions are always backed by previous experiences or information, which acknowledges that instinctive decisions have worked in the past. Decisions are not about making the choice and braving the consequences because you want to bindly trust your instincts. They are about combining your inner wisdom with the knowledge of systematic data to make the best decisions. Sometimes, rational analysis and data are impractical to be employed in certain situations. Absence of definitive criteria, and time and resource constraints, and novel situations are instances which limit the practicality of data. The only feasible option is to rely on what your instincts tell you. In these situations, instincts can help you make effective and quick decisions. https:/zhenti. burningvocabulary. com Combining instinctive and rational analysis produces well-rounded decisions. It reduces the chances of making mistakes, and has increasingly become a favorite approach to decision-making among leaders of today. 51. What does the author say businesspeople often do? A. Strive to make sense of some unknown forces. B. Avoid being driven by their own feelings. C. Draw on a vast wealth of past experience. D. Rely on instincts in decision-making. 52. What should we take into account in order to make informed decisions? A. The likelihood of errors. B. Systematic data and analysis. C. The complexity of circumstances. D. Personal feelings and business strategies. 53. What should people do in a decision-making process if instincts disagree with data? A. Resolve the dilemma with previous experience. B. Figure out which of the two is more reliable. C. Combine the two together. D. Prioritize instincts over data. 54. What should we do when facing various factors that limit the practicality of data? A. Make a rational and systematic analysis. B. Explore the most feasible options. C. Resort to our inner wisdom. D. Apply definitive criteria. 55. What does it take for decisions to become the best according to the author? A. Applying instincts and data in conjunction. B. Assessing all factors when making a choice. C. Recalling what has actually worked in the past. D. Refraining from trusting instincts arbitrarily.
题目解答
答案
问题解析及答案
51. What does the author say businesspeople often do?
解析：
文章开头提到，商界人士经常根据自己的个人感受或直觉做出决策。作者认为这种做法令人担忧，因为人们被某种未知的力量引导。因此，正确答案应该是与“依赖直觉做决策”相关的选项。
答案：
D. Rely on instincts in decision-making.
52. What should we take into account in order to make informed decisions?
解析：
文章提到，数据和分析长期以来与知情决策相关联。这些数据和分析减少了错误的可能性，增加了成功的几率。因此，正确答案应该是与“系统数据和分析”相关的选项。
答案：
B. Systematic data and analysis.
53. What should people do in a decision-making process if instincts disagree with data?
解析：
文章讨论了当直觉与数据不一致时的困境，并提出了解决方案：将直觉和数据结合使用，以做出最佳决策。因此，正确答案应该是与“结合两者”相关的选项。
答案：
C. Combine the two together.
54. What should we do when facing various factors that limit the practicality of data?
解析：
文章提到，在某些情况下，理性分析和数据是不切实际的，例如缺乏明确的标准、时间和资源限制，以及新颖的情况。在这种情况下，唯一可行的选项是依赖直觉。因此，正确答案应该是与“依赖内在智慧”相关的选项。
答案：
C. Resort to our inner wisdom.
55. What does it take for decisions to become the best according to the author?
解析：
文章最后总结，将直觉和理性分析结合使用可以产生全面的决策。这种做法减少了犯错的几率，越来越成为当今领导者的首选决策方法。因此，正确答案应该是与“将直觉和数据结合使用”相关的选项。
答案：
A. Applying instincts and data in conjunction.
解析
本文围绕商业决策中直觉与数据的关系展开讨论。首先指出商界人士人士常依赖个人感受或直觉做决策，接着说明依赖直觉仅在有丰富经验支撑时合理，否则主观性强易出错；然后强调数据和分析能减少错误、提高成功几率，是明智决策的基础，但当直觉与数据冲突时，应结合两者；最后提到某些情况下数据不实用的情况（如无明确标准、时间资源限制、新情况）下需依赖直觉，而结合直觉和理性分析能做出全面决策，成为领导者首选。
51题解析
题目问作者说商界人士经常做什么。根据文本首句“People in business often make decisions based on their own personal feelings or instincts”（商界人士经常根据自己的个人感受或本能做决定），选项D“Rely on instincts in decision-making”（在决策中依赖本能）符合，其他选项：A“努力理解某些未知力量”未提及；B“避免被自己的感觉驱使是应该避免的”与文意相反；C“利用大量过去经验”是依赖本能合理的条件，非经常做的事，故D正确。
52题解析
题目问为了做出明智决策我们应该考虑什么。文中明确提到“Data和分析长期以来与明智决策相关联。这些减少错误可能性，增加成功几率”，选项B“Systematic data and analysis”（系统数据和分析）符合，其他选项：A“错误的可能性”是数据和分析能减少的，非考虑内容；C“情况的复杂性”未提及但非明智决策需考虑的；D“个人感受和商业策略”未提及，故B正确。
53题解析
题目问决策过程中直觉和数据不一致时该怎么做。文中提到“这个看似简单的问题驱动了理解直觉和数据关系的需求。不使事情不复杂的解决方法是结合数据和直觉做出最佳决策”，选项C“Combine the two together”（把两者结合）符合，其他选项：A“用过去经验解决困境”未提及；B“弄清楚哪个更可靠”文中未说要比较可靠性；D“优先考虑数据前优先考虑本能”与文意相反，故C正确。
54题解析
题目问面对限制数据实用性的各种因素时该怎么做。文中提到“在某些情况下，理性分析和数据不切实际……唯一可行的选择是依赖本能告诉你的内容”，“本能即“inner wisdom”（内在智慧），选项C“Resort to our inner wisdom”（诉诸我们的内在智慧）符合，其他选项：A“做理性系统分析”是数据实用时的做法，此时不实用，所以错误；B“探索最可行的选择”文中说唯一可行是依赖本能，非探索；D“应用明确标准”是限制因素之一，文中说缺乏明确标准，所以错误，故C正确。
55题解析
题目问根据作者，决策成为最佳需要什么。文中末尾提到“结合本能和理性分析产生全面的决策……越来越成为当今领导者最喜欢的决策方法”，选项A“Applying instincts and data in conjunction”（结合使用本能和数据）符合，其他选项：B“做选择时评估所有因素”未提及；C“回忆过去实际有效的内容”是本能的支撑，非最佳决策的条件；D“避免任意信任本能”是依赖本能的错误做法，故A正确。